Search for: "Harper v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 936
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2022, 7:23 am
Harper, an elections case out of North Carolina that involves how much oversight state courts may exercise over federal elections. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
Bush v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 11:07 am
Schultz v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 8:53 pm
Ortho-McNeil Pharma. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:20 pm
Harper, a case that could determine whether state courts have the power to review election rules passed by state legislatures.Stay informed. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:20 pm
Harper, a case that could determine whether state courts have the power to review election rules passed by state legislatures.Stay informed. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:09 pm
Harper over at Belly of the Beast: The lawyers in Perdue v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:08 pm
The sealing requirement of CPL 160.50 "was designed to lessen the adverse consequences of unsuccessful criminal prosecutions by limiting access to official records and papers in criminal proceedings which terminate in favor of the accused" http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif(Matter of Harper v Angiolillo, 89 NY2d 761, 766 [1997. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Century Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 11:37 am
Bruen (2022) and United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 1:23 pm
The Supreme Court in Attorney-General of Saskatchewan v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:04 pm
Harper (5th Cir. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
High times at the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service [Luke Rosiak, Examiner via Jim Harper, Cato] 6th Circuit: In ruling company’s suit against union to be unfair labor practice, NLRB breezed past First Amendment issues [NLRB v. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 10:47 am
(See Harper v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:33 pm
Dep't of Labor & Indus., 48 Wn.2d 317, 318, 293 P.2d 391 (1956) (allowing benefits for arthritis); Harper v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 3:50 am
Hakima Benaddi v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:55 am
This is an outlook that not even the Supreme Court intended in R. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court didn’t address and debunk ISL on the merits (as it later did last summer in Moore v Harper), the Court dismissed Texas’s filing on the ground that Texas lacked standing under Article III because “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
Harper see this earlier Verdict essay. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
Harper, the speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives, Timothy Moore, asks the Supreme Court to consider what has come to be known as the “independent state legislature” theory — which holds that the Constitution gives state legislatures alone the power to regulate federal elections in their states, without the oversight of state courts. [read post]
