Search for: "Harvey v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
§ 105 that works of the United States government may not receive copyright protection, therefore also placing it in the public domain.However, as a copyright owned by a private individual, the Aboriginal flag is subject to the Australian standard duration of copyright protection - the period of Mr Thomas’s life plus 70 years - and will not otherwise enter the public domain until this period is over.Solutions? [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 9:16 am
Harvey, which I blogged about here. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
” Colorism in the United States is especially complex, Norwood adds. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
In his decision in Harvey v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 5:09 pm
Kennedy, and Harvey C. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 11:09 am
Munaf, the majority said, was tried and convicted by an Iraqi court, "not a tribunal of the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:03 am
Powledge Unit in Palestine, Texas. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 4:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:12 pm
They point out that this is 3M’s third bite at the apple — the company previously filed two similar cases in New York state court. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 5:52 am
Harwell v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 2:39 pm
The United States does not believe that Marcum factors apply or should be given as part of the instructions to panel members in cases where a violation of Article 133, UCMJ, is charged. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 3:29 pm
Constitutional law experts offer differing opinions on the impact of the case, Brandenburg v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
Event Report GuestKat Riana Harvey prepared an event report on this year’s Stockholm IP Law Review annual conference. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:43 am
| "Single unit of publication" registrations require publication as a singular, bundled collection, the 9th Circuit rules: Unicolors v. [read post]
