Search for: "Head v. Sullivan*"
Results 201 - 220
of 310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2024, 10:50 am
And in reaching the contrary conclusion, she wrote, the court of appeals misapplied the framework outlined in the court’s 1963 decision in Bantam Books v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:06 am
The unanimous ruling in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Harry Barko v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:12 pm
I’m scratching my head over this one. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
What makes this book stand out from the rest is a refreshingly accessible writing style with clear headings. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:35 am
One of the standout briefs he refers to throughout the book is that of now-Chief Justice John Roberts in Alaska v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:51 am
The first court decision discussing a delayed notice search warrant—that is to say, a covert search actually authorized in advance by a magistrate—is United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 11:01 pm
Bill Yeoman, Guy V. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 1:25 pm
We denounce and repudiate the hostage holding tactics of the legislature and urge that it not be condoned by replicating it.EMILY JANE GOODMANCAROL BERKMANPAUL BUCHANANROY TEPPERLAURA SAFER-ESPINOZAJAMES PAGONESELLEN COINALICE SCHLESINGERLARRY SCHACHNERSTEVEN JAEGERNICHOLAS DeROSAMARGARITA LOPEZ TORRESDENNIS McDERMOTTPHILIP V. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:16 pm
” If one were writing a latter-day Gilbert and Sullivan ditty about "people who would not be missed," Norquist would surely be a strong candidate to head the list. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 2:45 pm
In 1987, the Supreme Court broadly held in McNally v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:33 pm
On the other hand, if I were to write about "the Lieutenant Governor's office" doing something, without naming the LG or even treating the office as if it were headed by an officer/person, have I written about the LG, as this legislation defines it? [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:04 pm
Some of these search signals are very weak (tails) and some are very strong (heads). [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
An increasing number of states have enacted or are considering enacting legislation requiring financial institutions to provide customers “fair access” to financial services. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
And I might agree that a change in the procedural rules to require trial judges to state good cause more particularly than “in the interests of justice and fairness” would be well advised, though the Legislature has only seen fit to impose such a requirement in criminal cases.But declaring such a rule by judicial fiat on interlocutory review, and issuing mandamus relief against the trial court for not following it, turns our mandamus jurisprudence on its head. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
On one hand, two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
That ruling leaves us scratching our heads. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 4:21 am
In Neiman-Marcus v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:46 pm
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 5:05 am
In Lucia v SEC, the D.C. [read post]
