Search for: "Hernandez V. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,236
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2019, 4:21 am
A case involving the fatal shooting of a Mexican national by a United States Border Patrol Agent is back at the Supreme Court a second time as the Justices heard arguments this week in Hernandez v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:00 pm
They also considered the following cases: Hernandez v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
” Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s second argument, in Hernandez v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:58 pm
The Hernandez family’s case hinges on a 1971 case named Bivens v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
On the patent side of the house, patent law is still in a state of (what I hope is) temporary insanity (at least I hope it’s temporary) about section 101 (patent subject matter) eligibility and the definition of “abstract idea” and other silly things. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Last week’s post discussed how the initial investigation into Aaron Hernandez presents a compelling opportunity for students to learn the Fourth Amendment’s plain view doctrine. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 8:00 am
Parents Awarded $2.68 Million in Son’s Death Following Misdiagnosis; Hernandez v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:52 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at two “cases [that] will shed light on how far constitutional limitations protect against government power in immigration matters” —Hernandez v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:53 am
A federal district court in Texas also rejected the employer’s bid to calculate damages using a formula based on a monthly average of wages instead of the traditional weekly-average formula, but the employer was granted partial summary judgment on its undisputed contention that the employees’ damages would be limited by either the two-year or three-year statutes of limitations (Hernandez v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 11:47 am
The family relied on a 1971 case named Bivens v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Or, as the Supreme Court noted in Arizona v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In 1984, the Supreme Court created a now well-known “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:55 am
Appellate courts defer to the jury's judgment, and unless there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support the jury's verdict, the Court of Appeals (or the Appellate Division in state court) will not disturb the verdict.The case is Bradshaw v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:44 am
The Court of Appeals reinstates the false arrest claim.The case is Hernandez v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:32 am
State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 10:07 am
Several criminal and related cases are on the docket.NY State Rifle & Pistol v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:36 pm
Holguin-Hernandez v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:15 am
Khan v Hernandez, 122 AD3d 802, 803). [read post]
