Search for: "Hernandez v. U.s.*"
Results 201 - 220
of 228
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
Hernandez Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville 08a0765n.06 USA v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
Hernandez Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville 08a0765n.06 USA v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 11, 2008 Dutil v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Supreme Court, October 14, 2008 Moore v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:38 pm
Second, the New York State Court of Appeals has held to enforce the preemption of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 by the Graves Amendment (see Graham v Duckley, supra; Johnson v Kling, 854 NYS2d 648 [2 Dept 20081, reversed on other grounds, 10 NY3d 887 [2008]; Hernandez v Sanchez, 836 NYS2d 577 [1 Dept 2007]; Kuryla w Halabi, 835 NYS2d 230 [2 Dept 2007]; Jones v Bill, 825 NYS2d 508 [2 Dept 20063, reversed on other grounds, 10 NY3d 550 [2008]). [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Hernandez, No. 071828 In criminal defendant's objection to two-point sentencing enhancement, sentence including period of criminal supervision for conspiracy to distribute heroin is affirmed where: 1) defendant "committed the instant offense while under a[] criminal justice sentence," USSG section 4A1.1(d); and 2) the district court appropriately elevated his criminal history score by two points on that account. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, September 05, 2008 US v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Hernandez, No. 07-1828 In a matter of first impression concerning the application of section 4A1.1(d) of the federal sentencing guideline, sentence for conspiracy to distribute heroin is affirmed where: 1) defendant "committed the instant offense while under a[] criminal justice sentence"; and 2) the district court appropriately elevated his criminal history score by two points on that account. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:31 pm
US v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 21, 2008 US v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Relying on Anderson, California courts have shifted the burden of proof to employers when inadequate records prevent employees from proving their claims for unpaid overtime hours (Hernandez v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:24 am
Relying on Anderson, California courts have shifted the burden of proof to employers when inadequate records prevent employees from proving their claims for unpaid overtime hours (Hernandez v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 9:24 am
In UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
EVIDENCEUnited States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:51 am
US v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:18 pm
Read MoreIndirect Regulation of Economic Competition Hernandez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:21 am
Hernandez Covington (M.D. [read post]
