Search for: "High Bear et al v. Year et al"
Results 201 - 220
of 224
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
Court of First Instance rejects Lego’s appeal against OHIM’s Board of Appeals decision that Lego brick shape not registrable as a Community trade mark (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) OHIM opposition quality standards – the Office responds (IPKat) Charlie McCreevy puts forward proposal to reduce CTM fees by about 40% (Managing Intellectual Property) (Class 46) New protected geographical indications: French PGI Boeuf de Bazas for fresh meat and offal; Finnish PGI Kainuun… [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
Rev. 349 (2005) [hereinafter, “Schwartz, et al. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Finally, I believe, firms are going to face up to the reality that they need to take fresh approaches to the dilemma created by the fact that the prime child-bearing and family-starting years happen to coincide quite nicely with the path-to-partnership tournament years. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Michael Masjuan, et al., CV08-01889 JFW (C.D. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Skrobot, et al. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
Skrobot, et al. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
(Lehmann's case is reported in the High Command Case, U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 3:11 am
Inc., et al., No. 07-CV-1140 (S.D.N.Y.), was filed against Bear Stearns Asset Management Inc. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
REES, ET AL., Respondents. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 5:30 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 7:52 am
In the same week we find a High Court judge, Sir Michael Burton, ruling on the accuracy of Al Gore’s film. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:53 am
Radley, et al., Off-Label Prescribing Among Office-Based Physicians, 166 Arch. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:51 am
Will Scalia, Thomas et al think it important? [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 8:10 am
(One alternative case mentioned remains on the Court's docket: Marineau, et al., v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 11:30 am
" The 2-1 ruling came Friday in Parker, et al., v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 2:43 am
Levy, et al.)Why would the prosecution make a deal? [read post]
