Search for: "High v State"
Results 201 - 220
of 35,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
”[14] ETC Designation for BIAS Providers: High Cost and Lifeline Support. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
[High School Students from Minnesota and New York argued before a panel of three federal judges and visited the United States Supreme Court.] [read post]
Blog Post: Practical Guidance Offers Help with Workplace Issues during Mental Health Awareness Month
13 May 2024, 10:00 pm
See Bradford v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:06 pm
” “In addition, this bill could further increase receipts to the State General Fund from civil penalties (ranging from $100 for a Class II violation up to $10,000 for a Class V violation), imposed on food sales establishments that violate the provisions of this bill. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
On Thursday 16 May 2024 there will be an injunction application in the privacy case of Department for Education v Hercules KB-2024-000389 Reserved judgements Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot, heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others, heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini… [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTE [1] Basic v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 10:38 am
The car owners in this case had argued that due process does give them a right to a prompt hearing under Mathews v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:35 am
[7] Maslowski et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:39 am
La Rosa v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:45 am
The case is Jamie Allen Harless v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:14 am
Ball State University, where a student sued alleging a professor’s advances created a hostile learning environment, and Doe v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The committee was composed of the director of curriculum, instruction, and educational services; high school principal; junior high school principal; library media specialist; chair of the English department; and a “[p]rocess [c]onsultant. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The committee was composed of the director of curriculum, instruction, and educational services; high school principal; junior high school principal; library media specialist; chair of the English department; and a “[p]rocess [c]onsultant. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:18 pm
In the case of A.K. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
[FN5] The end of the pipeline, or "zenith" as plaintiffs describe it, is admission to one of eight New York City specialized high schools based on the results of the Special High School Admissions Test (the SHSAT). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
[FN5] The end of the pipeline, or "zenith" as plaintiffs describe it, is admission to one of eight New York City specialized high schools based on the results of the Special High School Admissions Test (the SHSAT). [read post]
