Search for: "His Law v. USA" Results 201 - 220 of 3,288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 7:08 pm by Kali Borkoski
  There was extensive coverage of, and a variety of reactions to, the Court’s decision today in Brown v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:42 am by Erin Miller
Briefly: The Philadelphia Inquirer has a feature on the University of Pennsylvania Law School Supreme Court clinic’s role in Padilla v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:18 am
  But even with that case, some presume he must have had some grand, sophisticated insight into the law, and that his non-compliance was either legally permissible or not worth bothering such a figure about.This reasoning is a mystery to me for a couple reasons. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
DOES 1-99 ND Illi 2013http://t.co/namjuCtHIZ -> Supreme Court Denies Leave To Appeal In C-Map USA Inc., et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 12:00 am
I’ve often wondered if he left the law because he could not cut it.But his work with Edward Snowden makes me a fan. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
The Court is of the opinion that the collage contained a political statement, criticising the Turkish Prime Minister for his policy on the international scene with regard the military actions by the USA, and in particular those in Iraq. [read post]
” Airgas USA Sued for Disability Discrimination Over Employee’s Hemp Use Source: MmeEmil / E+ / Getty Images In Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am by Amy Howe
Writing for USA Today, Mike Snider looks ahead to the Court’s decision in American Broadcasting Cos. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 6:45 am by Tom Smith
” In addition to the points noted by Carrington, Chemerinsky’s book contains other significant flaws, the most striking of which is his analysis of Brown v. [read post]