Search for: "Holder v. Smith"
Results 201 - 220
of 500
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
Holder, a challenge to the way in which the United States interprets immigration laws about drug infractions. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:04 am
In Kramer v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 1:01 pm
Never mind, the US Supreme Court has already agonised over these issues in Eldred v Ashcroft and Golan v Holder so we can be comforted that they weren't a problem after all. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 8:23 am
Related Cases: Alasaad v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:09 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Summaries will also be posted to Smith’s Case Compendium, here. (1) Sufficient evidence supported dogfighting convictions; (2) Leading question during State’s direct examination was not error; (3) The trial court did not err by ordering restitution for all the seized animals or by failing to explicitly consider the defendant’s ability to pay, but erred in converting the restitution award to a civil judgment absent statutory authorization State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
The ACPA prohibits “cybersquatting,” which occurs “when a person other than the trademark holder registers the domain name of a well known trademark and then attempts to profit by either ransoming the domain name or by using the domain name to direct business from the trademark holder to the domain name holder.” DaimlerChrysler v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
Holder, a 2009 immigration case. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 4:58 am
Smith, 2007 U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 5:57 am
Holder. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
Lee Tawes III v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 7:27 am
Holder. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
For example, every insurance policy I have read contains a clause providing that “family members residing in the same household” as the policy holder are excluded from coverage in the event of an accident. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
"Marbury v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:17 pm
The decision in Warren v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:49 am
The first case of the day will be Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
In addition to evoking memories of a time when congressional relief for unauthorized migrants was more possible, United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
ALAN SMITH, the Ward, Appellant, v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Bork v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
Historical Background Though not required by either federal or state law, fairness opinions became de rigueur following the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
