Search for: "Hollingsworth v. Perry"
Results 201 - 220
of 344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am
Perry, United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
"Most standing cases consider whether a plaintiff has satisfied the requirement when filing suit," explained Chief Justice Roberts for the Court in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
Sullivan was a case in which race and the First Amendment intersected, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
None of this is remotely new.The Proposition 8 decision, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
Mulkey (and indeed to the odd disposition of the Supreme Court in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:39 pm
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013, the Court heard arguments in the California Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:17 am
Perry (involving Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:30 am
Now the law throughout the United States, California has recognized gay marriage since 2008 (though only by those married during the window before Proposition 8 was passed) and then again in 2013 when the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Perry v Hollingsworth overturning the Proposition 8 prohibition. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
At the oral argument in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
Perry; Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:22 pm
In Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
The one-sentence order immediately nullified a stay order issued last June by the Circuit Court in the “Proposition 8″ case — Hollingsworth v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:43 am
Hodges went through Hollingsworth v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
See, e.g., Hollingsworth v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:54 am
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 2:25 am
” The amicus brief was filed in Hollingsworth v Perry (Dkt No 12-144), which is scheduled for oral argument March 26. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:54 am
As of now, the March 26 morning argument in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
Perry Shelby County v. [read post]
