Search for: "Hollingsworth v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
In Perry, the state of California (represented by a guy named Hollingsworth) asked for it to be reversed, which should have kept it alive. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 6:30 am
Hollingsworth v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm
Holder (Voting Rights Act) Merits Brief in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:00 pm
In a decision June 26 in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
Brown (now Hollingsworth v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
McAdams, Reforming Entrapment Doctrine in United States v Hollingsworth, 74 U Chi L Rev 1795 (2007) Thomas J. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:02 am
Tuesday, March 26: 12-144 – Hollingsworth v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
Ball State University, Mutual Pharmaceutical Company v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
” For this blog, Marty Lederman looks at the significance of the amicus briefs opposing same-sex marriage in Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
Baker v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
The same day as Windsor, theCourt in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am
Perry, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm
Hollingsworth, it's literally impossible to believe that the justices do not regularly take consequences into account in deciding what they do. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:32 pm
So do we.So we're glad to call your attention to the recent decision in Ingram v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 8:14 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 1:39 pm
— United States v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
” Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News examines the possible implications of a ruling by the Court in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:56 am
If the Court limits itself to deciding the precise constitutional issues presented in both cases, it will not have definitively resolved the question of whether a ban on same sex marriage is unconstitutional.In Hollingsworth v Perry, 671 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that where the California Constitution was interpreted by the Supreme Court of California as guaranteeing the right to marry to opposite-sex and same-sex couples alike, and… [read post]
