Search for: "Horne v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 6:23 am by Mark S. Humphreys
A similar opinion was issued by the Amarillo Court of Appeals in 1992, in the case styled, Horn v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 7:49 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This was restated by the Texas Court of Appeals of Amarillo, in 1992, in the case Horn v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:53 am
Nowhere in the complaint does the plaintiff allege, at a minimum, conduct by the college "acting under color of law which deprived the injured party of a right, privilege or immunity guaranteed by the Constitution or the laws of the United States" (DiPalma v Phelan, 81 NY2d 754, 756; see Sharrock v Dell Buick-Cadillac, 45 NY2d 152, 158; Moghimzadeh v College of St. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Emma Horne and Nicole Jaeckel preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Stouffer declined, and National Geographic ended up airing the series in 2012 under the title “Untamed Americas” within the United States, and “Wild America” outside of the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 3:59 pm by Cicely Wilson
United States 9th Circuit to Consider Arizona’s 20 Week Abortion Ban, Seattle Times (11/5/12) [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 3:59 pm by Cicely Wilson
United States 9th Circuit to Consider Arizona’s 20 Week Abortion Ban, Seattle Times (11/5/12) [read post]