Search for: "Humphrey v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2015, 9:14 am
United States, the Court will spell out when a mandatory minimum prison sentence is required under a federal law against child pornography, based on a prior conviction under state law for sexual abuse. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:10 am
United States, No. 14-8358. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
United States, 14-8358, the petitioner, a forty-six-year-old former aerobics instructor who claimed he became addicted to online porn while convalescing from a kidney transplant (it’s a familiar story), pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
United States, 14-419. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Humphrey, 14-8349, had six boxes of record arrive on the same day and likewise was relisted a second time. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Since Daimler AG v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:10 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Humphrey; and (3) whether the Heck v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
Therefore, the well is a facility "from which oil or a hazardous substance was discharged""into or upon the navigable waters of the United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
If civil rights lawyers begin invoking the principles elaborated and consolidated by popular spokesmen like Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey and Richard Nixon and Everett Dirksen, and not only depend on the opinions of the Warren and Burger Courts, these justices may begin to embrace an originalist framework that provides this great legacy with a solid foundation in popular sovereignty.Supreme Court litigators have one overriding objective: getting five votes on their side. [read post]
4 May 2014, 9:30 pm
Moreover, our approach undermines enduring dicta in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
TCRR identifies the principal catalysts of the revolution as Lyndon Johnson, Hubert Humphrey, Richard Nixon, Everett McKinley Dirksen, and Dr. [read post]
