Search for: "I v. B" Results 201 - 220 of 24,601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Class Action Defense Cases-Doiron v. Conseco Health: Louisiana Federal Court Agrees With Defense That Rule 23(b)(1) and (b)(2) Class Action Could Not Be Certified But Certifies Class Action Against Health Insurer Under Rule 23(b)(3)
13 Jun 2007, 5:48 am
Doiron v. [read post]
Class Action Defense Blog - http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/
Indiana Jones v. the Temple of Negligent Design
21 Jun 2006, 2:15 pm
I remembered how much I enjoyed The Historian from last summer, a solid B-book and thought, Poe is just as creepy as Vlad the Impaler. [read post]
Lawyerlike - http://lawyerlike.blogspot.com/
No Protection For Sole Proprietor Operating As A "D/B/A"
17 May 2007, 6:23 am
Given the holding of the case, I think not, but I continue to be amazed that courts simply plop sentences like that into an opinion to leave open for interpretation. [read post]
Juz The Fax - http://juzthefax.blogspot.com/
Walmart v. Dukes Primarily Impacts Civil Rights Class Actions
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm by Dan Bushell
AT&T Mobility LLC for consumer class actions (unlike many observers, I didn't see it as their end), then you might want to sit down before reading the Court's decision in Walmart v. [read post]
Florida Appellate Review - http://www.floridaappellatereview.com/
A-B Finds Safe Harbor
4 Jun 2015, 11:19 pm by Robert C. Lehrman
The Cruz v. [read post]
bevlog - http://www.bevlaw.com/bevlog
Important, But Not What I Was Hoping - Petition for Certiorari on FLSA Action
26 Sep 2012, 9:02 am by Michael Fox
  And so the fight, and as I say, still an important one, is over the correct application of Wal-Mart v. [read post]
Jottings By An Employer's Lawyer - http://employerslawyer.blogspot.com/
Sessoms
6 Jun 2011, 8:36 am by Jon Sands
Sessoms v Runnels, No. 08-17790 (6-3-11)(Tallman with Rawlinson; dissent by B. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Blog - http://circuit9.blogspot.com/
The "B" Corporation: Duties to Constitutiencies Beyond Shareholders
10 Jun 2008, 11:07 am
I found the bill analysis particularly interesting in its reference to the Chicago Cubs and Rutgers (I believe that the case referred to in the legislative analysis is Shlensky v. [read post]
TheCorporateCounsel.net Blog - http://www.thecorporatecounsel.net/Blog/
Connick v. Thompson (2011) and Arizona v. Youngblood (1988) - Linked in Outrage
1 Sep 2011, 3:27 pm by Dennis Wilkins
I wanted to add an issue that I did not address in my last post about Connick v. [read post]
Public Defender Dude - http://publicdefenderdude.blogspot.com/
Proper framework for analysis and evidence needed to establish inadvertent waiver under F.R.E. 502(b) – or – “I may not always be right but I’m never wrong.”
15 Dec 2009, 6:44 am
   Amobi v. [read post]
For the Defense - http://forthedefense.org/ftd.aspx
Blog Post: CA2 on CIMT: Giron-Molina v. Garland
20 Jun 2023, 11:36 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Giron-Molina v. [read post]
Legal Insights Blog - https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/
Wyeth v. Kappos.
17 Jan 2010, 10:18 pm by Jake Ward
On January 7, 2010, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
ANTICIPATETHIS.com - http://anticipatethis.wordpress.com
Trade mark ownership: As easy as A-B-C?
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am by Alyson Poole (AU)
Me, a name I call myself…but can I also call myself the author? [read post]
The Brand Protection Blog - http://www.thebrandprotectionblog.com/
Trade mark ownership: As easy as A-B-C?
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am by Alyson Poole (AU)
Me, a name I call myself…but can I also call myself the author? [read post]
The Brand Protection Blog - http://www.thebrandprotectionblog.com
More on the Ninth Circuit’s Decision in Dukes v. Wal-Mart
28 Apr 2010, 9:57 am by Matt C. Bailey
Yesterday, in a post contained here, I examined the Ninth Circuit’s commonality analysis in Dukes v. [read post]
Bailey Class Action Daily - http://www.baileydaily.com/
B&N almost entirely off the hook for copying backpack design
5 Dec 2014, 6:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rubio v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Eleventh Circuit grants rehearing en banc to consider whether “the risk of force clause in 18 U.S.C. sec. 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague in light of Sessions v. Dimaya?”
15 May 2018, 7:20 pm by Howard Bashman
Eleventh Circuit grants rehearing en banc to consider whether “the risk of force clause in 18 U.S.C. sec. 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague in light of Sessions v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
ECJ Judgment on Articles 11 (2) and 9 (1) (b) Brussels I Regulation
13 Dec 2007, 1:57 am
Today, the ECJ delivered its judgment in case C-463/06 (FBTO Schadeverzekeringen N.V. v. [read post]
Conflict of Laws .net - http://conflictoflaws.net
Blog Post: CA1 on Motions to Reopen: Tulung v. Garland
22 May 2024, 9:34 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Tulung v. [read post]
Legal Insights Blog - https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/
Peju Pursues Appeal of SDNY Decision Misapplying B&B Hardware On Issue Preclusion
12 Dec 2024, 5:47 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York in Cesari S.R.L. v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/