Search for: "I.S. V. STATE"
Results 201 - 220
of 17,497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2024, 4:58 am
Court of Justice of the EU, Bundesverband Souvenir - Geschenke - Ehrenpreise v EUIPO, C-488/16 P, at para. 38). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:07 am
The five categories of green technologies listed by the BRPTO are: (i) alternative energies; (ii) transportation; (iii) energy conservation; (iv) waste management; and (v) sustainable agriculture. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
This decision followed the Second Circuit’s earlier decision in Hamilton International Ltd v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am
Quick links Cloisters Chambers: Discrimination, belief and the “fundamental party rights”: the judgment in Ali v Green Party of England and Wales (i.e. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:00 am
The court distinguishes Lemmon v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 9:34 am
The case of Greene v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:18 am
(L to R) Mark Royero (2L); Adam Stolz (coach); Kaitlin Prece (2L); not pictured: Luis Reyes (coach) The Supreme Court of the United States can agree on something: In McElrath v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:17 am
" But then in House v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
” This continues the sordid state of affairs that existed prior to the pandemic, where hundreds of criminal cases were being dismissed annually for delay[9]. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:16 pm
The first level of the cascade involves real estate professionals providing certain settlement services in the settlement process (i.e., the person listed as the closing or settlement agent on a settlement statement). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
V Lions Farming, LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:04 am
From Erikson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 2:31 am
In Mobley v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
However, IP ownership related to AI-generated content under United States law is still in flux. [14] Hogan Lovells goes on to note that, because issues are in flux, the rights enforceable under a contract may not be enforceable against the world, i.e., non-parties to the contract. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
With Monday’s oral arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:28 am
That would mean that no direct evidence from Weisselberg (i.e., his federal testimony) or any leads from that testimony could be used to prosecute him. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am
V. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 1:06 pm
Thus, for an individual to have a lawsuit under the First Amendment for a violation of free speech, the individual must first be able to prove “state action,” i.e. that the government, and not a private individual, caused the deprivation of rights. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Additional Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
