Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES FOR THE NOTICE AND FILING OF OPINIONS" Results 201 - 220 of 497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
But the Fresh Start Initiative was adopted in 2011 – almost 7 years ago. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:29 am by Scott R. Anderson
While they disagree on the Second Circuit’s In re Vitamin C opinion, both the respondents and the Solicitor General are relatively sanguine about there being a degree of consensus among the rest of the circuits. [read post]
The Labor Commission may recover up to a $10,000 penalty for each instance an employer re-verifies the employment eligibility of a current employee at a time or in a manner not required by federal law. [read post]
The Labor Commission may recover up to a $10,000 penalty for each instance an employer re-verifies the employment eligibility of a current employee at a time or in a manner not required by federal law. [read post]
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:52 am by Barry Sookman
His case is now before the High Court of Australia after an Australia appeals court expressed the opinion that Google can be liable as a secondary publisher, but dismissed the case because of its procedural posture. [read post]
Allow the applicant specified periods of time to respond, then consider information submitted by the applicant before making a final decision, and then notify the applicant in writing of the final denial or disqualification, of any existing procedure the employer has for the applicant to challenge the decision, and of the right to file a complaint with the DFEH. [read post]
Allow the applicant specified periods of time to respond, then consider information submitted by the applicant before making a final decision, and then notify the applicant in writing of the final denial or disqualification, of any existing procedure the employer has for the applicant to challenge the decision, and of the right to file a complaint with the DFEH. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 12:20 pm by Melinda L. McLellan and Emily Fedeles
” Also in July, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued an opinion that may impact the Privacy Shield’s future. [read post]