Search for: "IN RE MOTION FOR CONFLICT COUNSEL"
Results 201 - 220
of 980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2013, 10:58 pm
Rather than delay proceedings by taking time to re-draft the motion, counsel understandably proceeded to file the document with the last-minute addition of a footnote recognizing the timing issue and suggesting that not all of the motion was relevant. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
We are discussing In re Transkaryotic, a relatively recent Delaware case that contains bad law and reflects the anti-plaintiff bias of the Delaware courts. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:40 am
If you’re interested in a free case consultation, feel free to contact us. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 10:39 am
Why do you think we're blogging on this issue? [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 8:42 am
According to the Committee, if that conflict is not otherwise waivable and legitimate health concerns make it “impossible for the lawyer to provide competent and diligent representation,” then the lawyer may withdraw as counsel. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 9:55 pm
., decided 6/10/2008)I love it when things work the way they're supposed to. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 9:44 am
In In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Reconsidering Prohibition on Communication with Third Parties (Motion 200) Defense counsel Alka Pradhan for Ali asked Judge Pohl to reconsider a June 2014 decision that prohibited detainees from sending statements to anyone outside their defense teams. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 5:04 am
You may never know the true source, but you will not be able to re-establish the confidentiality. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:02 am
See In re Digitek Prods. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
In my experience, when dealing with competent, professional opposing counsel they will recognize at once your right to adjourn the deposition and you can usually secure an oral stipulation on the record to the effect of "counsel, can we agree that this deposition will be designated as Volume I, and I can re-notice your client's deposition on a later date? [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:33 am
The disqualification motion has become a standard tactic, and firms have to find a way to respond defensibly without re-defining the process with every new motion. [read post]
16 May 2015, 4:45 am
The court cited In re Application of Hirts, CIV.A.03-CV-03156, 2004 WL 1588227, at *1 (E.D.Pa. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
We first highlighted the issue in the Got Credit Counseling? [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
We first highlighted the issue in the Got Credit Counseling? [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:30 am
Latham was hired after Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges was disqualified for a conflict in January, after handling the case for just three months. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:49 am
Neiman Marcus has vigorously opposed that decision via a motion for en banc review, arguing that Remijas conflicts with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Clapper v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:05 am
Once Barnhart re-entered the street, Stites activated his lights and sirens and pursued him. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
You're an attorney. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:58 pm
” However, the article goes on to quote defense counsel, including defense counsel in the Gig3 case, that the ruling could “lead to a deluge of lawsuits. [read post]
