Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS" Results 201 - 220 of 7,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2008, 3:40 pm
Connecticut and Delaware say that decisions not officially reported may be cited so long as a copy is provided to court and opposing counsel [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 7:52 am by Eric Goldman
” (If you’re confused by how constructive public trusts could apply to this context, trust me, you’re not the only one). [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:47 am
" "We're really delighted that a decision has been made on the viaduct. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 11:53 am by Keith L. Miller
  The committee believed that only a public reprimand was warranted, but both bar counsel and the attorney appealed the decision. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:09 pm by Levin Papantonio
The attorneys offered the following commentary in response to today's court decision:"This decision should be heard in boardrooms throughout the country. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
" If a town takes your property because it doesn't like you or what you're planning to build, but it says as a pretext that it'll leave the land as an empty field for a "passive park," is that bad-faith purpose still a "public use"? [read post]
Constitution prohibits public officials from recovering damages for defamation regarding their official conduct. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
A fictional public domain character like the Little Mermaid is not necessarily linked to a specific entity. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:44 pm by Cicely Wilson
Legal Materials Illinois Adopts Public Domain Citations Open Citation = Open Access The Dangers of Bluebook Infatuation Public Domain Legal Citations [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:44 pm by Cicely Wilson
Legal Materials Illinois Adopts Public Domain Citations Open Citation = Open Access The Dangers of Bluebook Infatuation Public Domain Legal Citations [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
” There was no need to decide this issue because the court held “the government does not have a privacy or publicity interest in restricting speech critical of government officials or public figures in the trademark context—at least absent actual malice, which is not alleged here. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 11:52 am by Moderator
Jumet admitted that he had falsely claimed that this "dividend" check was a donation for the high-ranking official’s re-election campaign. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:25 pm
The purpose of the Notice is to advise same-sex married couples of their California income tax treatment and tax return filing obligations resulting from the California Supreme Court's recent decision in In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm by Philip K. Howard
First, regulation must be re-codified to be goals-oriented, leaving room for citizens and officials alike to make sense of choices and tradeoffs at the point of implementation. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Torture, restraint chairs, public cavity searches, and the secret to eternal youth.] [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:45 am by Randy Shaheen
First, it noted that the investigation regarding a data breach had started before the public comments, and, second, the final decision to bring a complaint wasn’t made by the charged officials. [read post]