Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: R. S. T., A CHILD (MOTHER)"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2018, 7:55 am
It’s critical for parents to know their rights. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
After all, you're someone's child too, and we all need help. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:35 am
That’s the unstated goal of many a mother, including many who consider themselves advocates for full gender equality. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
But the counselors never mention abortion, will not answer questions about abortion, will not provide referrals to clinics or doctors who perform abortion procedures, and engage in a variety of techniques to squelch a client’s interest in such information. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:56 am
The Court must decide based on the child’s interest.... [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
By Geoffrey R. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
J and L, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon (2017) EWHC 3411 (Admin) This is a very interesting judicial review, concerning the interrelation of a council’s housing duties under Part 6 and Part 7 Housing Act 1996 and duties to children under s.17 Children Act 1989. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
But that doesn’t mean anything legally unless his biological tie aligns with the law’s treatment of the relationship.Parentage was once a relatively simple determination based on the mother’s marital status at the time of a child’s birth. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 1:24 pm
T-Mobile’s ad this year was a good example. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 2:30 pm
He has an interesting history, of which some highlights are: Evicting tenants (including single mothers or ‘battered wives’) because they were on housing benefit or ‘likely to result in property damage’. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
In re Sadie R., 2005-Ohio-325 (6th Dist.) [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 1:43 pm
In so doing it decided that: (1) Pennsylvania was the habitual residence based upon the child’s testimony; and, (2) Mother’s retention was not wrongful. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm
What legal principles connect publicity for the 17 year-old Charlie Pearce (born 3 July 2000), a double rapist and attempt murderer (R v Pearce (Press Restrictions) Haddon-Cave J (7 December 2017)) and privacy for a stalking mother who, with her cohabitant (‘Mr JM’) tried to disrupt her 10 year-old daughter T’s foster placement (Re T (A Child) [2017] EWCA Civ 1889 (23 November 2017)). [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 7:56 am
The Court held that under its existing precedent, the test in a name change case is the best interest of the child, which in this case was to keep the mother’s name. [read post]
30 Dec 2017, 3:16 pm
” The Release further provided that petitioner “designate[s] [respondent] Johnny Antonio Luna as a qualified and adequate adult competent to perform any proceedings to retain the girl if [her] rights as mother are terminated. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:15 pm
Maybe Child You didn't get what he wanted and you have to say, tough luck, kid, you didn't get what you wanted. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
The law didn’t have a chance of being upheld given the Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
Stern did not become the child’s mother. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:07 am
R. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 5:32 am
Specifically, Mother notes that statutory law in Mali expressly provides that “[t]he husband owes protection to his wife, the wife obedience to her husband. [read post]
