Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF J. A. C."
Results 201 - 220
of 5,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2011, 3:05 am
., No. 04 C 6372, Slip Op. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:45 am
J. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:48 am
Der-Yeghiayan, J.). [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:04 pm
Yates (supra) in the words quoted above and would apply to a case such as a title covering a whole page of original matter, or something of that nature, but would not justify such a wide extension of copyright as the appellant company has contended for, or the holding of McEvoy J. on this point. [read post]
1 May 2008, 4:05 am
., No. 07 C 5993, Slip Op. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:18 am
J.). [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 3:18 am
Jan. 29, 2008) (Shadur, J.). [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 4:15 am
., No. 08 C 950, 2007 WL 2688452 (N.D. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 4:07 am
., No. 04 C 6536, 2008 WL 696919 (N.D. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:42 am
., No. 08 C 1083, Slip Op. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 3:18 am
Roth, No. 05 C 3839 & 3869, 2008 WL 168693 (N.D. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:21 am
., No. 08 C 3248, Slip Op. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:36 am
Jun. 8, 2010) (Der-Yeghiayan, J.). [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 8:05 am
J.) [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 3:17 am
KG, No. 07 C 2467, 2007 WL 3145013 (N.D. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 4:46 am
Discontinuing General Municipal Law Section 207-c disability benefitsGamma v Bloom, 274 AD2d 14In Gamma, the Appellate Division concluded that an agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law can set out the controlling procedures for resolving disputes concerning Section 207-c benefits, including resolving any dispute concerning light duty assignments and the continuation of such benefits through arbitration.City of Newburgh police officer Stephen J. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:29 am
Posted by Avrohom J. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:13 am
Google, Inc., 2-11-cv-00319 (CAED January 18, 2012, Order) (Burrell, J.) [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
This is in line with decisions T 842/90 and J 20/00 where it was considered possible that the payment of an additional fee amounting to [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
The examining division equated the term "embodiment" with subject-matter that has to fall "within the scope of the invention as defined by the claims", and concluded that the description so adapted was not in conformity with the independent claims, contrary to Rule 42(1)(c) EPC, because the term "embodiment" was used in parts of the description that describe subject-matter that was not part of the subject-matter of these… [read post]
