Search for: "INTERN. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
– Lawfare Google takes on the International Telecommunications Union – The Multilateralist David P. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
: (Part 1 - SPICY IP), (Part 2 - SPICY IP) Global – Copyright International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI): ‘Three strikes’ effort hit worldwide home run: (Ars Technica), How to attribute a Creative Commons licensed work: (Molly Kleinman), Chrysalis disappoints, as new artists fail to incubate: (IP finance), DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) Events… [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
Reserved Judgments Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot, heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others, heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Parsons v Atkinson, heard 26 and 27 February 2024 (Farbey J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Wilson v… [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian Goddess, Inc… [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:04 am
R. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Grokster, regarding vicarious copyright infringement by the distributors of peer to peer systems. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:41 pm
Holder: In National Cable & Telecommunications Ass’n v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
In Barrick Gold Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
– Andrew Logie on need for fresh business strategy for rights-owning sector (IP finance) Why everybody lost The Pirate Bay trial (TorrentFreak) Swedish anti-piracy office threatens BitTorrent trackers (TorrentFreak) Big Content seeks injunction as Pirate Bay appeals verdict (Ars Technica) Hundreds protest against Pirate Bay decision (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) Pirate Party membership surges following Pirate Bay verdict (TorrentFreak) IFPI site under attack by Pirate Bay supporters… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:19 am
Pappert (pdf, pp. 77-79) and its reliance on the Supreme Court decision of United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:49 am
Bush used IEEPA to cut off al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups from the international financial system. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 12:45 pm
We demand the implementation of international rules,” Raisi said. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:06 pm
The legislation directly responds to the Second Circuit’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:35 pm
Switzerland) and the telecommunication service providers’ obligation to store communications data (case Breyer v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:01 am
” Likewise, in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 5:27 am
More importantly, it is a strong gesture directed to the international community that Hong Kong's character as an international city has fundamentally changed. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
