Search for: "INTERN. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2015, 8:21 pm
European telecommunications companies and Privacy International have disclosed that direct access is employed by a range of states beyond the Eurasia region. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:34 pm
In K-Tech Telecommunications v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In Schrems v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:45 am
Restrictions — United States International Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Developing such international agreements will be challenging, but the alternative is an increasingly chaotic and dysfunctional system for cross-border data requests that benefits no one. [read post]
A New Milestone: Appeals Court to Consider NSA's Mass Seizures and Searches on the Internet Backbone
4 Aug 2015, 3:10 pm
Today, in our landmark case Jewel v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:54 am
And while this is a big task with many possible facets—like direct fixes to the classification system, strengthened protections for whistleblowers, and a reform of the state secrets privilege—it is work that must be done to rebalance our democracy. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
However, many commentators thought that such injunctions in relation to future infringement applied only to to intellectual property claims, as provided for specifically in statute, until the recent case of Cartier International and Others v BskyB and others ([2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch)). [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am
There is a degree of international recognition that the operators of search engines should put in place such a system (which could obviously either be on a voluntary basis or put upon a statutory footing) to take account of legitimate complaints about legally objectionable material. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:36 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/AoBszeibPT -> LinkedIn’s “Reference Search” Service Doesn’t Violate Fair Credit Reporting Act–Sweet v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014]… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
For example, the European Parliament adopted a resolution to suspend the TFTP, a program that provides intelligence access to the Belgium-based Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT). [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:44 am
For more on this issue, see the report by Transparency International’s Argentine branch, Poder Ciudadano (citizen power). [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm
It relies on a network of international partners who help collect information worldwide, especially the intelligence agencies of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom (collectively known, along with the United States, as the “Five Eyes. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm
Google also submitted that the Judge was bound by a decision of Kenneth Parker J in R( British Telecommunications) v. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 8:28 pm
The Target decision was followed with Rendon v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
Those old style Communist Party members know only a system grounded in obsessive central planning and buoyed by anti-Americanism fueling an externally motivated nationalism. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 6:55 am
In the 43rd iteration of the Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast, Stewart Baker brought us, among other features, an interview with Ambassador Daniel Sepulveda, the man tasked with managing the US relationship with the International Telecommunications Union. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
