Search for: "Ian C. Read"
Results 201 - 220
of 234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am
As Campell J. indicates in para. 38, the TSX is governed by the Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:14 am
Since not everyone reads Twitter, I reproduce here a selection of my recent Tweets. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:51 pm
Read in PatLit why Russians have started patenting wooden sticks for lollypops. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:40 pm
It reads: “© 2009 Duke University Press, All rights reserved…. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:08 am
E-Commerce and Internet Law: Treatise with Forms Ian C. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:38 pm
It’s only a C felony. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 10:45 am
”: CAST NOT THE FIRST STONE I shall let Mr Grumpy C*nt have the last word on this opening topic… he has a point “Lewis (The Foreign Office minister Ivan Lewis) said that there had been 27 ministerial representations to China about Shaikh’s case in the last two years. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:04 am
Read with the IPKat. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am
It’s a profoundly small-c conservative concept. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:14 pm
By Bob Hockett The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in a fascinating case that DoL readers might find particularly interesting in a time of financial turbulence. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 12:17 am
It's only a C felony. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
Once you have written them, read them out loud. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
Once you have written them, read them out loud. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
Once you have written them, read them out loud. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 12:54 pm
The IPKat is grateful to his readers for providing him with further information on the reference to the European Court of Justice by the Cour de Cassation, France, of Case C-235/09 DHL Express France SAS v Chronopost SA (noted by a very tired Kat at the end of a long day here). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 12:17 am
I am indebted to Professor Ian Walden of the School of Law, Queen Mary, University of London for the case I'm going to write about.The case is R. v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
Is that need the result of: a) there being no person who has parental responsibility. b) his being lost or abandoned c)the person caring for him being prevented from providing him with suitable accommodation or care. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:07 am
McIntyre, 184-187 | HTML |Information Technology LawBy Ian J. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:07 am
McIntyre, 184-187 | HTML | Information Technology LawBy Ian J. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 1:51 pm
Ian Kinsler (Tex - 2b)Other choices here were Ryan Howard, Jimmy Rollins, or Chase Utley. [read post]
