Search for: "Icon Health & Fitness" Results 201 - 220 of 331
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm by Cicely Wilson
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., United States Supreme Court (4/29/14)PatentsThe Patent Act authorizes district courts to award attorney’s fees to prevailing parties in “exceptional cases,” 35 U.S.C. 285. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:25 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., which makes it easier for a wrongfully accused defendant in a patent action to recover fees from a plaintiff, I am more interested in whether this same new decision will make it a little less likely that a wealthier company with a questionable patent will take to the courts to try to shut down a comparatively less wealthy competitor or, if not shut them down, to at least bog them down in litigation they cannot afford except by shortchanging… [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:40 pm
Meanwhile, David Berry, writing for PatLit, discusses Octane Fitness LLC v ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., No. 12-1184 (U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 9:38 am by Kristen Fries
  OCTANE FITNESS In the opinion delivered by Justice Sotomayor, the Court, in a 9-0 decision, construed the term “exceptional” in its plain and ordinary meaning and held that exceptional means “uncommon,” “rare,” and “not ordinary. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:38 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., rejects the Brooks Furniture framework as unduly rigid and inconsistent with the text of §285. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:46 am by Melissa Barnett
ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., the issue on appeal was what constitutes an “exceptional case,” which would allow a district court to award attorney fees to the prevailing party. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
Icon Health and Fitness and Highmark v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:42 pm by Jim Singer
Icon Health, which produces NordicTrack exercise equipment, sued Octane Fitness for infringement of a patent covering components of an elliptical training machine. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
ICON Health and Fitness [SCOTUSblog backgrounder; JURIST report] the court ruled [opinion, PDF] that the framework used by the district court to award attorney's fees was too rigid. [read post]