Search for: "In Re: Extended Stay Inc" Results 201 - 220 of 452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2018, 12:00 pm by Robert Liles
Unfortunately, a physician’s documentation practices often become more relaxed as time goes on – especially when the physician’s claims have not been audited for an extended period of time. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:00 pm by Robert Liles
Unfortunately, a physician’s documentation practices often become more relaxed as time goes on – especially when the physician’s claims have not been audited for an extended period of time. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
Body Blue Inc.; Synergism Arithmetically Compounded Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Afro-IP)   Australia Major changes to Patents Act proposed; proposed changes anger Australian patent attorneys (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) (Managing Intellectual Property) IP examination centre in Melbourne to boost Australian innovation and jobs (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court: ‘Use it or lose it’ approach confirmed: E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan (Mallesons Stephen Jaques)   Bulgaria M-Tel ‘best Bulgarian brand’ in independent… [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(BLOG@IP::JUR) New Madrid fees for applications designating the EU to become effective 12 August (Class 46) Latest European appellations registered: Polish TSG Olej rydzowy for oils; Italian PGI Abbacchio Romano for meat (Class 46) India Patents, public interest and pricing: Madras High Court decision in M C Jayasingh v Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd & Ors (Spicy IP) Ramkumar patent case: New Delhi Customs favours Samsung; Customs order stayed by Madras High Court (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP)… [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:38 am by Adam Levitin
FCC (In re Airadigm Communs., Inc.), 519 F.3d 640, 655 (7th Cir. 2008). [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
(Live Journal) (Patently-O) (Invent Blog) (Filewrapper) (Article One Partners) (IP Whiteboard) District Court S D Iowa: Delay from stay pending reexam not ‘inherently prejudicial’: Middleton Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Montgomery Ward & Co (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (GRAY On Claims) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) District Court S D Iowa: Intent to deceive inferred when plaintiff adds element to patent claims to overcome rejection but fails to disclose prior art containing that element: Sabasta et al v Buckaroos, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D New York: Failure to disclose specific combination of prior art precludes invalidity argument based on such combination: Metso Minerals, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 pm
The ITC construction for "bonding wires extending downwardly alongside" was also disputed, the objection going to "alongside. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Inventive Step) (Patent Docs)   US Patents Applying Supreme Court precedent: Carlsbad Technology v HIF Bio (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) USPTO not laying off employees (IP Watchdog) USPTO maintenance fees (Patently-O) Merchants warranty of non-infringement (Patently-O) PLI patent bar review tour (IP Watchdog) Provisional patent applications: waiting to file non-provisionals (Patently-O) 35 USC § 315(C) and its uncodified cousin – inter partes re-examination… [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]