Search for: "In Re: FDIC" Results 201 - 220 of 704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2020, 2:04 am
In re Heritage Bank, Serial No. 88540253 (September 9, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Frances S. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:53 pm by Kevin Funnell
We're hearing from various sources that the FDIC has been hammering community bankers for alleged UDAAP "violations" related to batch processing. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 4:11 pm
The FDIC depositor amount was raised to $100,000 in 1980. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:13 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We're back at it for the week leading up to Christmas—are you? [read post]
23 May 2007, 8:37 pm
Regulators and bankers said they're not anticipating stricter audits for banks that practice prudent underwriting standards. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:25 pm
The title of the account and the social security number on the account are factors used to determine if we're dealing with one depositor with multiple accounts or multiple depositors. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:12 am by Robert Berg
  The lack of FDIC insurance is not prominently disclosed, if it is disclosed at all. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:54 pm by Kevin Funnell
Kevin is all over it, and if you're not already following his D&O Diary blog, you should be. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:34 pm by Kevin Funnell
" That's great if you're planning to kill your bank. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:20 pm
When a fellow banking lawyer recently told me that the FDIC was, indeed, commencing its pursuit of directors of failed FDIC-insured banks, I thought it would a good time to re-post this short exposition on the problems associated with trying to impose legal liability upon folks with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 2:19 am
This failure will cause the FDIC another $450 million to $550 million in losses. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:45 pm by Kevin Funnell
There are many ways to incur the wrath of the FDIC if the bank fails. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 10:48 am by Jeffrey Andersen
  Among other things, the 35 questions and sample regulatory text suggest that the following standards might be included in a future rule: Limitations on permissible capital structures (e.g., limits on external credit support, leveraged tranches, re-securitizations, and other such features). [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 2:54 am
"Unless you're off your lithium, you should be able to understand that the picture posted and the questions asked are part of a joke. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:54 pm by Kevin Funnell
The FDIC, subjected to accusations that it made Kanas & Co. rich at the FDIC's expense, thinks this deal worked out well for all concerned, including the FDIC. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:03 pm
A Perspective from Greg Richardson, a Managing Director of Johnson Capital(re-printed with permission from Mr. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:53 am by Stephen Lubben
  I do think a chapter 11 model makes more sense than an FDIC model, but the $50 billion fund actually makes some sense. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:03 am by John Jascob
Recommendation: the FDIC and CFTC should continue their work on CCP resolution planning. [read post]