Search for: "In Re: Garrett"
Results 201 - 220
of 436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Arkansas Supreme Court – gigantic ($billion+) state AG action verdict on novel theory in statutory quasi-class action· Garrett v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:17 am
(Eugene Volokh) An “intimate partners without benefits” case, from In re Adoption of G., N.Y. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:01 pm
this afternoon along with Professor Garrett Epps and Professor Lisa McElroy. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:15 pm
And six months later, you’re saying, maybe not. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 1:12 pm
You can’t litigate your way to prosperity unless you’re a lawyer. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:05 pm
For further information regarding the public comments, please contact Garrett Levin or Ben Golant at (571) 272-9300, or garrett.levin@uspto.gov or benjamin.golant@uspto.gov. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:14 pm
Garrett do? [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 1:41 pm
And you’re interested because this is the audience that went crazy for a post about a Playmate from 1994. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
Huffman (herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Change of Child Custody Reversed in Crossville Post-Divorce Dispute: Garrett v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:49 am
Representative Scott Garrett (R-NJ) introduced a resolution, H. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:14 am
Garrett pressed Chair White to commit that the SEC will not be "bullied by these outside radical groups." [read post]
6 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Garrett (6th Cir. [read post]
6 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Garrett (6th Cir. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 11:52 am
Lautenberg in fact recognized this by his declaration that he would not run for re-election in 2014, which is surely the wise and correct thing to do. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:10 pm
Mass. 2008); In re Garrett, 2008 WL 6049236, *1 (Bankr. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Former Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson is, at this hour, giving this speech at Fordham Law School in New York: Keynote address at the Center on National Security at Fordham Law School: A “Drone Court”: Some Pros and Cons by Jeh Charles Johnson[1] March 18, 2013 [preliminary extemporaneous remarks] Thank you for this invitation. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
Broekman: Telling Boxes—Towards a Kevelson Archive12.30 – 14.00: Lunch in the Katz Hall14.00 – 14.45: Larry Catà Backer: Legal Semiotics and Political Practice: The Semiotics of a One-Party System14.45 – 15.30: Meghann Garrett: From Intellectual Property Attorney to In-House Council—A Change in Perspective15.30 – 15.45: Tea/Coffee Break15.45 – 16.45: Alan C. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:50 am
On Monday (January 28, 2013), Microsoft and wholly-owned Google subsidiary Motorola Mobility will square off in federal court in Seattle to discuss the implications of a grant-back clause in a license agreement Google signed with patent pool firm MPEG LA for the rate-setting part of the FRAND contract case in the Western District of Washington. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:59 am
Quoting Garrett v. [read post]
