Search for: "In Re: Mark Green v." Results 201 - 220 of 658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
KG v President of Gernamn Patent- und Markenamt (IPKat) Geobra Brandstätter assert copyright against vicar Pfarrer Markus Bomhard for using ‘deformed’ Playmobil figurines to depict biblical scenes (IPKat) (The IP Factor) Bundesgerichtshof on when a trade mark is distinctive enough to qualify for registration: STREETBALL case (Class 46) Still no infringement of Tuc cracker shape, says German appellate court (Class 46)   Greece Well-known MOUYER… [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:58 am
Green No. 94,162 Johnson CountyAngela KeckCapital murder (motion to withdraw plea)Issue #1: Denial of motion re: advances in arson scienceState v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
(Trademark Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturns State anti-counterfeiting law: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v Omar (IP Spotlight Precedential no. 39: TTAB reverses 2(d) refusal of VOLTA for caffeine-laced vodka: In re White Rock Distilleries, Inc (TTABlog) Test your TTAB eye-ball ability on two triangle design marks for clothing: L.A. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
McHugh and (for example) Mark Obbie of Slate spoke with me before writing about my views. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
Inc (Chicago IP Litigation) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Argonne Battery Tech – Argonne is a governmental green patent licensing success story (Green Patent Blog) Becton Dickinson – Another false marking case transferred – false marking defendants now 10 out of 11: Tex Pat, LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am by Marie Louise
Lakh Enterprises (Spicy IP) Determination of prima facie validity of registered mark: Bhole Baba Milk Food Industries Ltd v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
(Just an Examiner) Clean tech in court: Green patent complaint update (Green Patent Blog) Guest post: Mark Twain’s patent interference (Patently-O)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC on BPAI in In re Leithem: “This conclusory analysis is hardly persuasive (IPBiz) CAFC finds construction of term unnecessary: Respironics v Invacare (nonprecedential) (GRAY on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking statute is… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
If you’re going to be crazy, you have to get paid for it or else you’re going to be locked up. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
And the undisputed evidence shows that the District has classified all apartment complexes as residential users under Res. 02-02. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IP Watchdog) Legal studies program suspended (just_n_examiner) Books as prior art (just_n_examiner) Northern District of Illinois continues as top IP court – Administrative Office of the US Courts 2008 Annual Report (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Re-exam delays cause trouble for patent owners (Law360) Recovering pate [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
In Garrahy v Bord na gCon [2002] IEHC 147 (14 February 2002), O’Higgins J held that the sentiments in Bonnard v Perryman “have been heeded by the courts and nowadays are fortified by the provisions of Article 10 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom” – the position is similar in England (Greene v Associated Newspapers [2005] QB 972, [2004] EWCA Civ 1462 (05 November 2004)) and Northern Ireland… [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]