Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases"
Results 201 - 220
of 402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
Maryland–which ought to control this case. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
The Court of Appeals therefore “re-aff [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:00 am
In re N.A.D. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
” These are not technically relists, but they’re worth brief comment anyway. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Elonis wins at the Supreme Court, and the case is sent back for a new trial, a new instruction would be given to the jury but a conviction seems likely in any case. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
,” you’re right. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:01 am
In such a situation, the defendant was legally entitled to have the court instruct the jury that coming armed to such a confrontation wasn’t itself enough to strip the defendant of the right to self-defense. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 1:41 pm
This is, of course, how the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure work. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
AstenJohnson, Inc. 13-1252Issue: Whether, in a federal jury case, a district judge's procedural failure to make detailed findings under Daubert v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
He flatly refused to participate in the military commission proceedings and instructed his trial counsel not to present a substantive defense. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
The court applies a harmless error standard and says that the jury would have convicted anyway, if given the proper instruction. __ Is this a privacy case or a threat case? [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
DeGeorge Financial Corp., 306 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2002), and thus by necessary implication of other precedent in that circuit following that standard (this means you, Zubulake); andRequiring a finding of specific “intent to deprive another party of the information’s use in the litigation,” under Rule 37(e)(2) before any federal jury can be instructed on evidentiary presumptions from loss of electronic information.The last of these items, if adopted, would… [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Plaintiffs predictably sought sanctions that went to the merits of the litigation – to bolster their silent majority of weak cases – rather than just discovery-related issues – demanding default judgments, adverse inference jury instructions, and of course even more cost-shifting, when defendants are already saddled with the great majority of the cost of producing far more information and data than is ever used in any trial. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:36 pm
Present Legal Standard for Personal Injury Causation Under the Laws of the State of California All of the prior “BAJI” instructions were re-drafted into the present jury instructions entitled, California Approved Civil (Jury) Instructions (aka “CACI” Instructions). [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:19 am
As you know, there is no “right” to a jury trial in civil matters, only criminal matters provide that option. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
She sought an order prohibiting the Red Cross from introducing evidence that it provided proper aftercare, as well as an instruction allowing the jury to infer negligence by the Red Cross due to its spoliation of evidence. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
Jan. 23, 2013), the court found that a defendant had a duty to preserve text messages on his iPhone as potential evidence, but it refused to sanction the defendant with an adverse inference jury instruction. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:30 am
In a patent and trademark infringement case, the court ordered an adverse inference jury instruction and monetary sanctions against the defendants for the spoliation of evidence. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 10:06 pm
”The case went to the jury. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 12:39 pm
” Ergo, the jury instructions in this case prevented the jury from considering the proper standard by which her termination should have been evaluated. [read post]
