Search for: "In Re Amendments to Rules of Civil Procedure"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2019, 2:55 am
Sapirstein’s naming of the Realty Companies as “additional defendants on the counterclaims” was technically correct as a matter of New York civil procedure – Section 3019 (d) of the Civil Practice Law and Rules allows a defendant to join a non-party to a counterclaim “whereupon he or she shall become a defendant. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 7:00 am
But we’re not here to talk about CHINS cases, except to say that CHINS cases are civil in nature and subject to the rules of civil procedure (this is a hint about how this is going to come out in the end, by the by). [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 1:05 pm
In approving the proposal, the court cited Chief Justice John Roberts’ recent comments that recently amended Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 “crystalizes the concept of reasonable limits on discovery through increased reliance on the common-sense concept of proportionality. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm
Writing on the 2016 equivalent reforms in New South Wales, Andrew Dickinson lamented the tenuous connection that could justify long-arm jurisdiction under the amended Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW). [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 8:00 am
The court stated that the standard for amending pleadings under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(c) and 15 continues to govern the raising of new affirmative defenses even when an amended complaint is filed. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:59 am
Because the record fails to show strict compliance with the rules of civil procedure, we will reverse.II. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm
Thanks to the Bill of Rights’ guarantees of certain civil liberties, we’re also protected from egregious abuse of power by authority figures…right? [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:18 am
Because Harrison could not produce the requested documents, Utah moved for sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b) and (e); however, the court seemingly only analyzed Utah’s application under Rule 37(e). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:18 am
Because Harrison could not produce the requested documents, Utah moved for sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b) and (e); however, the court seemingly only analyzed Utah’s application under Rule 37(e). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:18 am
Because Harrison could not produce the requested documents, Utah moved for sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b) and (e); however, the court seemingly only analyzed Utah’s application under Rule 37(e). [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:08 pm
We do not reach the remaining constitutional issues and affirm the ruling of the Fifth Circuit on the Seventh Amendment ground alone. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 3:03 am
Second, as noted above, the Rules Enabling Act forbids the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure from abridging or modifying any substantive right. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:19 am
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 45. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:25 am
For example, the ACA amended the Civil Monetary Penalties Law (“CMPL”) to subject to civil penalties, any person who knows of an overpayment and fails to report and return it. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:05 am
To date, a re-argument date has not been set.In the meantime, it has come to light that the Supreme Court Civil Procedural Rules Committee has drafted Proposed Recommendation No. 248, seeking to amend PA.R.C.P. 4003.5, which pertains to expert discovery.This Proposed Recommendation from the Supreme Court Civil Procedural Rules Committee brings State practice more in line with Federal Practice. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:05 am
To date, a re-argument date has not been set.In the meantime, it has come to light that the Supreme Court Civil Procedural Rules Committee has drafted Proposed Recommendation No. 248, seeking to amend PA.R.C.P. 4003.5, which pertains to expert discovery.This Proposed Recommendation from the Supreme Court Civil Procedural Rules Committee brings State practice more in line with Federal Practice. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 4:05 pm
Under Practice Direction 53 of the Civil Procedure Rules, a defence relying on honest opinion required specificity. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:50 am
The wording of the amendment is taken straight from Rule 3.1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, and Rule 11 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 7:58 am
If you're a First Amendment junkie, Husain is a hell of a case. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:13 am
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not expressly allow motions for reconsideration, but district courts generally treat them as being filed under Rule 59 or 60. [read post]
