Search for: "In Re Application to Change Name"
Results 201 - 220
of 5,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2010, 5:11 pm
Dean Katz was selected from a deep pool of extraordinarily talented and accomplished applicants. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:26 am
rock group Spinal Tap was first called "The Originals," but upon learning of another group that already used that name, they changed to "The New Originals." [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 2:55 am
In re Jimmy Moore LLC, Serial No. 86353015 (August 24, 2016) [precedential].Applicant's headaches stemmed from the original sin of misidentifying its services. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 4:02 am
"Although no person associated with applicant has the surname INGLIS, the company was named after John Inglis and the name is used to indicate the quality of the weapons his company produced. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 4:20 am
"It is therefore very difficult to change a child's name. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 7:50 pm
I obtained a name and gender change court decree several months later. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:42 am
” In Re: Napp Technologies, Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:39 am
As the particulars of proposed changes are known, they will be addressed in future editions of the Beyond Telecom Law Blog. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:38 am
In re United States Steel Corporation, Serial No. 86174180 (April 8, 2016) [not precedential]. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
But will Blingville have to change its name? [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:14 am
” In re Am. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Wojtach, or someone named RICHARD to those unfamiliar with Applicant. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 8:25 am
The post Are State Registration Deadlines Changing under COVID-19? [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:23 am
If you do not want your name, your submission or an extract of it to be made public or disclosed, please state this clearly in your submission. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 2:26 am
Also, respondent may have believed that the change of circumstances permitted a second application. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:22 am
Additionally, if no inventor is named in an application, s. 13 requires that the applicant identify the “person or persons whom he believes to be the inventor or inventors” in the application - clearly referring to persons and not non-human inventors. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:22 am
Additionally, if no inventor is named in an application, s. 13 requires that the applicant identify the “person or persons whom he believes to be the inventor or inventors” in the application - clearly referring to persons and not non-human inventors. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:22 am
Additionally, if no inventor is named in an application, s. 13 requires that the applicant identify the “person or persons whom he believes to be the inventor or inventors” in the application - clearly referring to persons and not non-human inventors. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:22 am
Additionally, if no inventor is named in an application, s. 13 requires that the applicant identify the “person or persons whom he believes to be the inventor or inventors” in the application - clearly referring to persons and not non-human inventors. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 2:41 pm
: Obviously, there is no fundamental re-working of the claim-filing process going on here. [read post]
