Search for: "In Re Harm's Appeal" Results 201 - 220 of 5,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2022, 12:45 pm
You're creating a record of something intangible; family love. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:02 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner testified he  put together a google website to convey the risks that he believed M.P.J. was facing and to appeal to others for help in locating him. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am by Madelaine Lane
On Wednesday January 27, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court denied 19 applications for leave to appeal, denied the petitioner-appellants’ motion for reconsideration in the case of In re Brandon Gavin Handorf, Case Nos. 139742, 139753, 139754, and adopted the recommendation of the Judicial Tenure Commission in In re Nebel, Case No. 140203, and In re Sanders, Case No. 140202. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am by Sarah Waller
An offence involving low culpability and low harm will fall into band 1A. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 2:08 am
(4) Is Article 7(5) of Directive [96/9] to be interpreted as meaning that the repeated and systematic re-utilisation of insubstantial parts of the contents of the database which conflicts with normal exploitation or unreasonably harms the legitimate interests of the database maker is not permissible, or is it sufficient for there to be repeated or systematic re-utilisation? [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:31 am
On March 28, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit reversed the grant of class certification in In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation, Nos. 07-2257, 07-2258, 07-2259, 2008 WL (1st Cir. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal arguably side-stepped the issue, noting that Mitting J had said he “merely used the dictionary definitions as a check, and no more” and that “no harm was done”. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 9:48 am by Sam Favate
Supporters of the petition to force a vote on the law appealed to halt the release, claiming that reprisals, vandalism and death threats could result, but U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
The New Hampshire Supreme Court released In Re James N. on October 8, 2008 holding that the basis of a CHINS petition under the Child in Need of Services statute cannot be founded upon a delinquent act. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 12:46 pm
It's an important issue, and today's split decision by the Court of Appeal cogently identifies the competing positions. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 11:26 am by Blair & Kim, PLLC
  The appeals court pointed out it had previously rejected a similar res judicata in Muma v. [read post]