Search for: "In Re Kerr"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,239
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2012, 2:21 pm
You don’t have time to look at notes when you’re up there at the podium. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:45 pm
Only if they’re cute. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:36 pm
Yes, prosecutors are professionals — but they’re also politicians, which means that their discretion may be employed politically. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 1:06 pm
I'm a big fan of Kerr's blogging, and he does make a couple useful points. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:29 pm
If you’re not convinced, watch the video of this part of Obama’s statement: Obama was pausing repeatedly and looking for the right word, and the delay in time it took for that sentence to come out makes clear that Obama is making two distinct points in that sentence. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm
So we’re going back to the ’30s, pre New Deal. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:35 am
You might think you’re going to get an “A” on an exam next week, but that’s not a fact. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 2:03 pm
As Orin Kerr noted on Lat’s Facebook page, “I am looking forward to the Forbes ‘Top 10 Lawyers Under 10. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:27 am
You're working on that opinion on a computer, connected to the internet, where everyone is talking about what you are doing. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:14 am
Kerr told AP the practice is “an egregious privacy violation. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 10:57 am
Kerr, 415 F.Supp.3d 861, 874 (S.D. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 9:35 am
I thought I would re-post a link to my guide for law students on how to read a legal opinion: “How to Read a Legal Opinion: A Guide for New Law Students. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 2:35 pm
At the very least, this is language worth mentioning to explain why it’s not a test you’re think you’re bound to as a trial judge. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:44 pm
After all, we're good guys, and why would the government possibly want to know what we're up to? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:08 pm
(Orin Kerr) The decision is In re INNOVATIO IP VENTURES, LLC PATENT LITIGATION. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 5:20 am
You’re no better than the other guy. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:35 pm
(Orin Kerr) To my mind, the most troubling aspect of the Harvard e-mail controversy is how many people feel comfortable publicly judging someone based on a single forwarded private e-mail. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 10:50 am
In In re Search Warrant No. 16-960-M-01 to Google, Judge Rueter reached the opposite result and ruled in favor of the government. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 10:27 pm
(Orin Kerr) My co-blogger Randy Barnett offered an interesting response to my post below on taking a vow of consistency in arguments about the mandate. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:08 pm
Sometimes we're debating about how to divide a multi-million dollar business interest, other times, pirated cable television. [read post]
