Search for: "In The Matter Of: S.C.R." Results 201 - 220 of 367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am by Alex Manevich
” Re Canada Labour Code, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 50 at 91, per La Forest J. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Canada (National Energy Board), 1976 CanLII 2 (SCC), [1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, at pp. 394-95: [W]hat would an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically – and having thought the matter through – conclude. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
On appeal, that order was quashed and the matter was sent back for rehearing. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Barrette, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 392 [St. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:45 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Longueuil (City), 1997 CanLII 335 (S.C.C.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 844, at para. 52, and the Constitution Act, 1867, ss. 92(8) and 92(16).) [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Sarrazin, 2011 SCC 54, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 505, at para. 25). [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The Court reasoned that a standard must be assessed as a matter of substance and not procedure. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 8:28 pm
Taylor, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 892 at paras. 60 - 61). [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Pepsi Cola Canada Beverages (West) Ltd., [2002] 1 S.C.R. 156. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:27 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
“what would an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically-and having thought the matter through-conclude? [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Morgentaler, 1988 CanLII 90 (SCC), [1988] 1 S.C.R. 30 (hereinafter R. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:50 pm by MacIsaac
  The attribution of an occurrence to a cause is, I take it, always a matter of inference. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Mohan, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 9 (Online: https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1131/index.do). [7] Ibid. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 9:29 am by The Legal Blog
The word 'family' in the content is not to be under stood in a narrow sense of being a group of persons who are recognised in law as having a right of succession or(1) A.I.R. 1914 P.C.44. (2) [1955] 2 S.C.R. 22, 42-43. (3) [1965] 3 S.C.R. 841, 850-851.having a claim to a share in the property in [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
However, there is more to this than just the matter of reprinting the Constitution. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:28 am
Whether or not issues of separate legal personality and corporate law are so routine as to make it obvious that this is not an appropriate enforcement action for Canadian courts is a matter of intense dispute. [read post]