Search for: "In The Matter of the Application of Public Law 16-1995" Results 201 - 220 of 395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
" Motor vehicle rental and leasing defendants use the Graves Amendment as a tort defense to indirect or vicarious liability under state laws such as New York's Vehicle & Traffic Law § 388. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 10:31 am by Dennis Crouch
"In this case, however, with no material factual disputes, this court cannot share the Board's analysis and application of the law to those facts." [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:48 pm
Bharat Forge, (1995) 3 S.C.C. 434, and it is a pity that it was not considered in this case. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm by Marty Lederman
In earlier posts, such as this one, I noted that in the context of commercial activities, the Supreme Court—and virtually every other court, for that matter—has consistently construed the Free Exercise Clause and religious accommodation statutes not to require religious exemptions from generally applicable regulations, from at least 1944 until this week. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
In particular, the material may be objectionable under the domestic law of one jurisdiction while being regarded as legitimate in others [56]. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPKat),Amazon gift ordering patent revoked by the EPO: (OUT-LAW), (IP Law360)Legal protection for databases: case report on dispute between the British Horseracing Board and William Hill: (OUT-LAW),Court of First Instance rejects Enercon's appeal to register a football-shaped wind turbine as a Community trade mark: (Mondaq.com),More on registrability of Tarzan's yell as a trade mark at OHIM: (OUT-LAW), (more from… [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
    Jonathan Joseph is a member of the California State Bar and has focused for over 33 years on regulatory, corporate, securities and transactional matters for banks and bank holding companies and officers and directors of distressed and failed institutions. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
In this respect, requests for pseudonymity in such cases might not just be a matter of protecting privacy[7] but also be a matter of protecting reputation and preventing retaliation. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Victor Kattan
Of the States that advance this claim, 16 are parties to the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
As a matter of first impression for our Circuit, we hold that the legislative invocation at issue constitutes government speech. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:24 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The applicant (appellant) appealed against the decision of the Examining Division refusing European patent application No. 03793825.5, published as international application WO 2004/023347.II. [read post]