Search for: "In re: Rivera v." Results 201 - 220 of 230
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2008, 8:40 am
Rivera QUEENS COUNTYCriminal Practice Interrogation Twenty-Nine Hours After Arrest Does Not Render Statements Involuntary People v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Appraisal - Commercial 2 Mike Akerly Indigo Sky Properties Development 3 meir the babaev group developer 2 shanell rhodes Investor Investor / Owner 1 Giampolo Rivera Cantor Fitzgerald Investor / Owner 2 Paul Menendez, Jr. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:39 am
 A8102A Rivera P -- Relates to the disclosure of clinical information to the division of parole Same as S 4006-A Last Act: 06/20/08 amend and recommit to codes06/20/08 print number 8102aA11735 Rules (Aubry) -- Relates to post release supervision No Same as Last Act: 06/20/08 referred to codesS8614A NOZZOLIO -- Provides that upon imposition of a determinate sentence of imprisonment, the imposition of the appropriate period of post-release… [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 9:19 am
Wiretap guru Judge Betty Fletcher (left) brings us a disappointing Title III decision this week in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:18 pm
Comm'n, 290 F.3d 1, 6-7 (1st Cir.2002) (declining to decide the issue); Carmona-Rivera v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:00 am
While Rivera claimed that his state of intoxication negated the “knowingly” element of the crime, he apparently failed to raise that defense at the time of trial.And since nothing in the record suggested that he was “under the influence” at the time of the incident, the AD1 was of the opinion that the lower court’s verdict was consistent with the evidence.We're betting Rivera was drunk with sorrow after that… [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 5:09 pm
" The opinion bagging on In re Mitchell P. was written by Timothy Reardon, and joined by Ignazio Ruvolo and Maria Rivera. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Guadalupe-Rivera, No. 05-1939 Sentence for charges involving drug distribution and firearm violations is affirmed over defendant's contentions that the district court: 1) abused its discretion in refusing to conduct an evidentiary hearing on whether certain prior convictions on which the court based his sentence were actually part of the instant offense; and 2) erred in relying on his confidential juvenile record without disclosing the content of that record to him. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
It also found the supposed damages too attenuated even to qualify as an Article III case or controversy in federal court, citing Rivera v. [read post]