Search for: "In re: Tam" Results 201 - 220 of 757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2009, 8:10 am
"   Vermont Agency of Natural Res. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:51 am
The FUCT appeal (In re Brunetti is currently suspended at the CAFC. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:19 am
Tam, which then rendered the Section 2(a) disparagement refusal moot. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 5:12 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Tams, reviewing Tommaso Soave, The Everyday Makers of International Law: From Great Halls to Back Rooms The Last PageRicardo Reis (Fernando Pessoa), Quanta tristeza e amargura afoga       [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:22 pm by Josh
This article is brought to you by The Qui Tam Team, the epicenter for whistleblowers and people interested in the False Claims Act, Qui Tam Provisions, and Medicare and Medicaid fraud. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:15 am
Constitutionality: In In re Tam, the Supreme Court held that the disparagement provision of Section 2(a) was facially unconstitutional because it violates the Free Speech clause of the First Amendment. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Did Brunetti correctly apply Tam? [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
for "printed manuals, posters, stickers, activity cards and educational worksheets dealing with physical activity and physical fitness"].In re Tam, Appeal No. 14-1203 (Serial No. 85472044, September 26, 2013) [precedential] [Section 2(a) disparagement refusal of THE SLANTS for a musical band]. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
“There is a group of people who will profit from disasters illegally, and they’re despicable, but they’re out there,” Kohn told Bloomberg Law. [read post]
If you know about fraud against a government agency and you’re ready to speak up, you can learn more about whistleblower lawsuits at a free, confidential consultation. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 2:14 am
The Second, Ninth and Eighth Circuits prohibit a fee award following a dismissal based on subject matter jurisdiction, while the Seventh and Tenth Circuits do not.FN3 The Court recognizes that the Eighth Circuit has not considered the issue in the specific context of a fee award to a prevailing defendant in a qui tam action pursuant to 31 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 10:03 am by Jay P. Lechner
By now, you’re probably aware that the new health care bill (Pub. [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:02 pm by Josh
Consider this: you committed a crime, weren't wiley enough to avoid getting caught, and now you're in jail. [read post]