Search for: "In re: WL HOMES" Results 201 - 220 of 1,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am by Will Aitchison
Since we’re in Umbria, I really shouldn’t be writing anything at all, but I’m up with the chickens (literally) and the rest of the family isn’t. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 10:45 am
In re HP Inkjet Printer Litigation, 2008 WL 2949265 (N.D.Cal. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
See, e.g., In re Sanders, 72 B.R. 124 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1987)(mobile home located in Tennessee not exempt under Florida law as not located within the State of Florida), In re Schlackman, 2007 WL 1482011 (Bankr. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 1:16 pm
In re Sanders, 72 B.R. 124 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1987)(mobile home located in Tennessee not exempt under Florida law as not located within the State of Florida), In re Schlackman, 2007 WL 1482011 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.2007)(Florida courts construe the Florida constitutional homestead provision to require that the homestead be located within the State of Florida for the homestead exemption to be applicable). [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:58 am by Juan Antúnez
Second, if you’re going to sue a PR, and you want to claim diversity jurisdiction, you do not look at the PR’s home state, it’s the decedent’s home state that counts. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:48 pm by Nexsen Pruet
. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (2011) (2011 WL 93716, filed January 7, 2011)On January 11, 2011, I posted an entry to this blog addressing the South Carolina Supreme Court’s decision in the above-referenced case. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:30 pm by Jordan Bublick
 On September 29, 2014, the Court issued its decision in In re Phillip, 2014 WL 4802758 (11th Cir. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm by Bexis
American Home Products Corp., 231 S.E.2d 269, 276 (N.C. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm by Bexis
  General jurisdiction requires a defendant to be “at home” in the jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 6:05 am by Jeffrey Brown
"[D]escribing yourself as “tall, dark and handsome,” when you’re actually short and homely, will earn you a handsome orange jumpsuit. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:04 am
Nov. 8, 2007); In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, 2007 WL 3334339 (E.D. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 8:06 am by Joel R. Brandes
The child's nursery manager also noted the child's unusual behavior and concluded that the "home 'environment obviously had a negative effect upon [her]. [read post]