Search for: "In re Answers Corporation Shareholders Litigation"
Results 201 - 220
of 291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2011, 10:39 am
Shareholders Litigation and In re Answers Corp. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:11 am
" This decision and its recent companion decision, In Re Answers Corporation Shareholders Litigation, C.A. 6170-VCN (April 11, 2011), list many deal protection measures that the Court has accepted. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:21 pm
Not surprisingly, the answer is “yes. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
Shareholders Litigation, 2004 WL 253521 (Del. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:41 pm
In the case of publicly traded corporations, a large percentage of the company’s shareholder-owners are pension funds investing the retirement money of teachers and other government employees. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
In the end, I am arguing for a radical re-ordering of society, to be carried out over decades in an orderly fashion. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:00 am
Or, if its litigation and you're working with the CEO, you want the company to look good to the shareholders. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 3:12 pm
In addition, fiscal 2009 corporate expenses are offset by $17,000,000 of proceeds received from a litigation settlement with Kraft. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:02 pm
In re AIG; AIG v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 1:56 pm
I use the word “potential” because the corporation can re-file itself and erase the personal liability. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:28 am
Relying on In re Homebanc Corp. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:21 am
In re PSE&G Shareholder Litigation, 173 N.J. 258, 276-277 (2002). [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
The only other reported case addressing the same provision, In re Pharmaceutical Industry Average Wholesale Price Litigation, 478 F.Supp.2d 164 (D. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
While we're on the subject of corporate privacy, let's consider exactly what WikiLeaks is going to leak about corporations. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:04 pm
Your answers to these questions will be determined by your own unique circumstances. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
Prior rulings in this hotly contested litigation have been highlighted here. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:18 pm
The corporation is a private, non-reporting company (e.g. it has less than 50 shareholders, does not distribute its shares to the public, etc.) [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
In light of Cohen, neither corporations nor their shareholders have the right to enforce the disgorgement provisions in Section 304. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:58 am
Skeptics have wondered whether litigants might be able to game any substitution. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:50 am
This answer did not move me from my initial skepticism. [read post]
