Search for: "In re Appellate-Motion Electronic Filing"
Results 201 - 220
of 333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2009, 9:51 pm
The case focused on a type of structural information called "metacodes", specifically Extensible Markup Language ("XML") used in electronic documents. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
Applicant Eolith's appellate gamble paid off when the Board reversed the PTO's refusal to register EL DORADO for "computer electronic games; automatic slot machines" (class 9). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 10:18 am
Any specific method of electronic monitoring must be approved by the court and be the least restrictive to reasonably ensure return to court as well as being unobtrusive to the greatest extent possible. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Though the court erred in failing to inform him of the terms of his appellate waiver per FRCP 11(b)(1)(N), that error was not particularly egregious. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
As to the defendants, since no investigation is made to ascertain that the defendant is actually someone who engaged in peer to peer file sharing of copyrighted music without authorization, there are many defendants who have no idea why they are being sued and who did nothing even arguably violative of anyone's copyright. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
’” See Planetary Motion, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Advocacy LLP offers a weekly electronic newsletter, Supreme Advocacy Letter, to which you may subscribe. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:38 am
On remand, the case went back to Judge Stanton, who ruled quickly on YouTube's motion for summary judgment (YouTube's final brief was filed less than 2 months ago). [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:43 pm
")) Several interested parties (Applebaum, Jonsdottir, Gonggrijp), represented by the ACLU and EFF, filed a motion seeking to vacate the order, but they were unsuccessful. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 10:12 am
Failure to answer a subpoena duces tecum will result in the issuer filing a motion to compel compliance regarding said subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:21 am
Yes, we make all filings electronically, unless the court instructs us otherwise. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:49 am
Wife filed a motion to dismiss.On April 3, 2012, the court conducted an evidentiary hearing on Husband's claim for absolute divorce, and, because Wife's responsive pleading asserted that the couple had `cohabitated and engaged in marital relations’ while the case was pending, the court ruled that it would first hear testimony on the threshold question of whether Husband could establish grounds for an absolute divorce. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 8:04 am
” In re Marriage of Karonis, 296 Ill. [read post]
27 May 2023, 11:05 am
”[P]leadings” includes any petition or motion filed in the dissolution of marriage case which, if independently filed, would constitute a separate cause of action, including, but not limited to, actions for declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and orders of protection. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
We're not even talking about the Supreme Court deciding to overrule an earlier decision. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Aviles-Colon, No. 05-1384, 05-2039, 05-2040 Conviction for conspiracy to distribute heroin, cocaine, and marijuana at three drug points in Puerto Rico in violation of 21 U.S.C. sections 841(a) and 846 and for possession of firearms, is affirmed for two appellants and vacated for the third appellant where: 1) with respect to the two appellants there is no reversible error; and 2) with respect to the third appellant, the government failed to disclose exculpatory… [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
AMICUS EXHIBIT A-1 LOCUS OF DEFENDANT WHEN SUED IN TRAVIS COUNTY, AND LOCUS ON LOAN APPLICATION/NOTETHECB COLLECTION SUITS FILED IN JANUARY 2017 (N=95). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
The plaintiffs filed their notices of appeal the following day. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Riccio, No. 07-2604 Conviction and sentence for submitting a false statement on a background check form to his former employer is affirmed over defendant's claims that the district court: 1) abused its discretion in denying a motion for mistrial based on the government's prosecutorial misstatements during the trial; 2) erroneously instructed the jury on the intent element of his charged offense; 3) erred at sentencing by considering his sworn and counseled deposition testimony… [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 10:24 am
That article further confirmed much that previously was only deducible, so that such points no longer are merely deducible, but now are a matter of both deduction and existing journalistic confirmation, and, as well, could be further confirmed within the next few weeks because of events set in motion by the Times' piece. [read post]
