Search for: "In re C. B-W"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,706
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
C-P-354/2013. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm
Even if you’re practically minded, it’s an idea worth grappling w/ b/c of potential for negative effects on innovation going forward. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:42 am
DIMENGO, DAVID W. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 9:06 am
Proceedings proved difficult b/c the plea may not have been lawful. [read post]
27 May 2013, 6:20 am
The email included the following excerpts: [Subject line:] Firm slogan becomes `Bose means Snuff Porn Film Business’ w/addition of [Jane Doe] . . . . [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm
Does that mean it’s content neutral, b/c what you’re regulating is the source identification function? [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:10 am
Dawn White, 13-1041-cr, the Circuit provided the following, REMAND for re-sentencing only, “with directions to the District Court either to make specific findings to support the enhancement under U.S.S.G§2B1.1(b)(11)(C)(I) or to sentence White without regard to that enhancement. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Fashion: first mover + TM protection for brand name is arguably sufficient b/c of ephemerality of designs. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:38 pm
I’m not clear on what they’re supposed to be learning. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm
Ct doesn’t directly address license v. sale b/c they say it’s a sale. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Sholk, A Guide to Election Year Activities of Section 501(c)(3) Organizations, (Updated 2020 version).Scott Wiener, Guardianship, Women, and Religious Freedom in Saudi Arabia, (USCIRF Update, Nov. 2020). [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
Introduction by Donna C. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Traditional narratives about goodwill are flawed b/c they don’t go back before the 19th century. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am
A: publishers are not interested b/c it’s financially daunting to create the ebook w/no assurance that Apple would allow it. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 6:16 pm
Id. at *9-10.3) And, as in those cases [IPXL and In re Katz], it is unclear here when infringement would occur. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm
Compliance starts far earlier than you anticipate b/c of operational and engineering runup time. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:03 am
Google folded b/c DOJ got their emails. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:33 pm
” The court concluded that “[w]hat Biomet has done complies fully with the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b) and 34(b)(2). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 12:44 am
w ten sposób, ? [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:38 am
Even if they could, that’s not a good idea b/c litigated cases don’t just resolve conflict b/t the parties; they’re supposed to tell us how to shape our future actions, and if it’s individualized CBA then there’s functionally no precedent because of changes in markets, individuals. [read post]
