Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 201 - 220
of 13,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2020, 4:22 am
In re Monfrere, Serial No. 88004556 (March 2, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 6:11 am
What is needed is a re-establishment of confidence and trust. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:06 pm
E.g., bigger bonuses; enhanced parental leave. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 3:30 am
We’re often drawn to evidence that confirms what we might already believe, such as a generalization about the employee’s age (e.g. boomers or millennials) or past performance. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 2:10 pm
But they're not. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 7:19 am
On September 13, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case, In re: R.K. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:20 am
Services franchises can offer business services (e.g. insurance, printing), services related to residential and commercial real estate and fixtures (e.g. landscaping, plumbing), or personal and consumer services (e.g. education, health care). [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 8:51 pm
If those kids were bright enough to get the honor of speaking, they're bright enough to understand plagiarism.On some other college plagiarism (collaboration?) [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 11:04 am
See, e.g. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 11:42 am
"(1) When the government promises something in a verbal plea agreement, but then then allegedly breaks that promise -- and admits as much -- you're not bound to your part of the deal (e.g., your guilty plea). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 7:38 am
Other courts have read the provision as a wide-ranging grant of discretionary authority that shields the Fed from any liability that arises from termination decisions—except as impliedly amended by later-enacted federal anti-discrimination statutes.See, e.g., Fasano, 457 F.3d at 288. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 2:48 am
In re Nett Designs, Inc., 236 F.3d 1339, 57 USPQ2d 1564, 1566 (Fed. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:19 am
So if you're reading this, take heart that you are not alone. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:39 pm
The court also suggested that the constitutionality of the proposed amendment depended in an important way on the fact that it was only allowing for a single re-election (e.g. allowing a President to run for only a second term).As was noted in Martín’s post, Uribe’s and his follower’s attempt to call for a constitutional referendum in order to allow Presidents to run for a third term was struck down on different grounds, including ‘strictly’… [read post]
6 May 2020, 8:57 am
Employers should develop processes to respond consistently to employees who respond to any COVID-19 health questions affirmatively (e.g., not allowing such employees to enter the workplace). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:16 am
As I noted, we’re going to examine a Connecticut case: State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:00 pm
E.g., In re Dresser, 972 F.2d 540 (5th Cir. 1992). [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:43 am
See, e.g., Prairie Eye Center v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:55 am
My students sometimes ask me why we read dissents, since they're not the law. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 6:52 am
But I do think it explains why they're not happy. [read post]
