Search for: "In re James E." Results 201 - 220 of 1,941
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm by News Desk
“Because the reported symptoms have been so severe and so little is known, we’re advising people to avoid tara flour until we understand what is causing the illnesses, and until consumers can be assured that any products containing tara flour in the wider market are safe,” says James E. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  “If no sane person would think that officials should strive to interpret the rules of basketball in the spirit of James Naismith,” he asks, “why should a sane person think judges should strive to interpret constitutional rules in the spirit of James Madison. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 12:47 am by Frank Cranmer
Assisted dying On 4 July 2022, assisted dying was considered in a Westminster Hall debate; this took place as a consequence of the e-petition 604383: Legalise assisted dying for terminally ill, mentally competent adults. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:30 am by Emma Snell
HIGHLAND PARK SHOOTING  Robert E. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
Higginson, A Short History of the Right To Petition Government for the Redress of Grievances, 96 Yale L.J. 142, 155 (1986); James E. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 2:03 pm by Alexandre Miura
Speakers include James Bridgeman SC, Professor Mark Engelman, Jane Lambert, Christian Panayi, and Elizabeth Nicholls. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 3:59 am by SOQUIJ
La requête de l’appelant est accueillie; celle de l’intimée est accueillie en partie. [read post]
The SEC explained: [W]e believe that NEPA requires and authorizes the Commission to consider the promotion of environmental protection along with other considerations in determining whether to require affirmative disclosures by registrants under the Securities Act and the Securities and Exchange Act . . . . [read post]
Or are questions like these irrelevant because, as the draft proclaims: “[W]e cannot allow our decisions to be affected by any extraneous influences such as concern about the public’s reaction to our work”? [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
  The argument that Congress in 1872 had prospectively shielded Cawthorn from a Section 3 challenge lodged 150 years later—a tortured, ahistorical, purportedly textualist argument—had been advanced by Cawthorn’s lawyer, veteran Republican elections attorney James Bopp, Jr. [read post]
21 May 2022, 11:25 am by Kevin LaCroix
From left to right, James Cooper of Clyde & Co; Aisha Anwar; me; and Dr. [read post]
12 May 2022, 8:58 am by Heather Szilagyi
A significant question facing the House Select Committee investigating the attack on the U.S. [read post]