Search for: "In re James Q."
Results 201 - 220
of 290
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm
James Grimmelmann, Speech Engines Discussant: Jane Bambauer Debates about how to regulate search engines, particularly with respect to bias. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:10 am
Or how about this one… Q. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 5:36 pm
If somebody talks EBITDA, put your hand on your wallet; they're a crook. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
We’re just getting going. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
No one created taxi medallions; they’re a gov’t entitlement. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:58 am
Moderator: James Fishkin, Stanford University Jaron Lanier, author and technologist: He’s been a booster in his time, but we’re doing well enough in Silicon Valley that we can afford to be self-critical. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
” In practice, many of the gripe cases say they are following First Amendment precedents, only when they’re confronted by a subset of noncommercial speech—that which does not solicit the purchase of the speech itself. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
French archeologist Quatremère de Quincy argued against reviving the traditional Roman right of conquest, which was abandoned by the eighteenth-century law of war.[12] Quatremère declared, “in civilized Europe, that which belongs to the arts and sciences is beyond the rights of war and victory. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:08 am
” [James H. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Friends of Fiji and In re: National Heritage Foundation, Inc. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
Q. 47, 81 (2005). [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:57 am
When you look at law firm growth though, it was driven by demand, not by need to re-assure associates. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:15 pm
Rutledge is best known, however, for his towering dissent in In re Yamashita. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 12:22 pm
Asks how law firms can re-capture lost revenue and suggests that AI will help lawyers do this. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
On 3 May 2018 Sir James Munby P gave directions in the case of Re Venables [2018] EWHC 1037 (Fam) (see above). [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 1:13 pm
The text of the remarks follow. along with the text of a short Q&A. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:02 am
O'Melinn, Pettit College of Law, Ohio Northern University, What if James Madison were to assess the intellectual property revolution? [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
[w]ere ambiguous, and the Court d[id] not find that they [we]re”); James T. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
For instance, a practitioner can be sanctioned for knowingly or with reckless disregard making false statements under 8 CFR 1003.102(c), engaging in frivolous behavior under 8 CFR 1003.102(j), engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice or undermines the integrity of the adjudicative process under 8 CFR 1003.102(n), failing to provide competent representation under 8 CFR 1003.102(o), failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness under 8 CFR 1003.102(q)… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
An Economic Model of Intermediary Liability James Grimmelmann, Cornell Law School; Cornell Tech Economic claims about effects of liability regimes are common. [read post]
