Search for: "In re Mark C. (1992)"
Results 201 - 214
of 214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
Said, 63 Ohio St.3d 690 (1992) (“[A]ctual malice requires consciousness of the near certainty (or otherwise stated “great probability”) that substantial harm will be caused by the tortious behavior. . . . [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 12:12 pm
Of course, the easy selection would be Michael Nifong, the former District Attorney for Durham, North Carolina who was motivated by his own re-election and engaged in unethical, and probably criminal, conduct in the prosecution of three Duke University Lacrosse players. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
Natural Res. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
I quote below the body of the argument in the brief, minus the footnotes; but if you’re interested in the issue, you might just want to read the PDF. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
While many consider these general principles to be a secondary source of international law that “may be invoked as supplementary rules… where appropriate” (14), some consider them on an “footing of formal equality with the two positivist elements of custom and treaty”. (15) Examples are the principles of res judicata, equity, justice, and estoppel. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
INTRODUCTION The new, third edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence was released to the public in September 2011, as a joint production of the National Academies of Science, and the Federal Judicial Center. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 12:42 am
Hispanic Heritage week was recognized officially during that transformative period that marked the 1960s by President Johnson, and expanded into a moth long observation during the presidency of Ronald Reagan in 1988, when legislation to that effect was enacted. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1992)). [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:33 am
"You're sick, your hair falls out, and your family is stressed. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:33 am
"You're sick, your hair falls out, and your family is stressed. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
According to one press report, Angel Diaz "appeared to be moving 24 minutes after the first injection, grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and appearing to mouth words". [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
., In re Synchronoss Sec. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
Cyberspace is not a “No Law Land”. [read post]
