Search for: "In re Merrill" Results 201 - 220 of 751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2008, 3:22 pm
No; the players may be re-shuffled but the intrinsic demand will remain the same.No, because the primary "demand" comes from the Fortune 1000 and FTSE 100, not Wall Street.It could actually increase demand in the short run as things need to get sorted out.Hard to say/too soon to tell.Yes: The era of massively leveraged I-Bank balance sheets is over.Yes: The era of rampant securitization of everything in sight is over.Regardless of deal flow, we will be moving to a more regulated… [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 1:07 am
Merrill Lynch, 828 F.2d at 1569; see H. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
In a memorandum opinion and order issued on March 27, 2024, in In re Yellow Corporation, et. al., Judge Craig T. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 9:21 pm
The plaintiffs of In re Oppenheimer Rochester Funds Group Securities Litigation are alleging federal securities law violations. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
In In re Goldman Sachs, plaintiffs challenged the compensation structure put in place at the investment banking firm. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 9:38 am by Mike
 If you're a bad person, you can certainly re-create yourself. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:01 pm by Tom
Incredibly, over the past couple of years, the Department of Justice (the Enron Task Force has, mercifully, been disbanded) actually has been threatening to pursue a re-trial of the Merrill defendants. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 5:30 pm
We’re going to encourage you to continue the voting through the weekend and into next week before we make our final announcement. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:29 am
"FROM THE UPCOMING ISSUE  |   A veteran employment attorney defends AIG bonuses: they're ethically offensive, but a contract is contract. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 8:54 am
Cases cited included In re American Fertility Society, 188 F.3d 1345 (CAFC 1999), In re Merrill Lynch, 828 F.2d 1567, In re Steelbuilding, 415 F.3d 1293In Acumed v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 3:36 am
  With Bear Stearns laying off over 7,000 employees, Lehman Brothers rumored to layoff over 20,000 employees, and Merrill Lynch expected to layoff thousands after their sale to Bank of America, we're on track to see over 150,000 people lose their jobs this year. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 11:03 pm
" Rogoff, who is also an economics professional at Harvard went on to say that "we're not just going to see mid-sized bank go under in the next few months, we're going to see a whopper, we're going to see a big one, one of the big investment banks or big banks. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 9:25 am by Tom Smith
” A battle cry in a song, “We’re Not Gonna Take it Anymore. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 11:20 am
He didn't specify which office he'll be based out of, but we're assuming D.C. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 2:05 pm
My personal opinion is that if you're not in a nationally registered and well-known stock brokerage house you are in the wrong office. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 2:05 pm
My personal opinion is that if you're not in a nationally registered and well-known stock brokerage house you are in the wrong office. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 3:00 pm
[Concurring Opinions] * Nationwide Layoff Watch: Merrill Lynch. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice$125 Million Settlement in Shareholders' Actions Against Merrill Lynch Approved as Fair, ReasonableIn re Merrill Lynch & Co. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 2:54 am
In addition, the re-trials of Howard's former co-defendants from the disaster that was the first Enron Broadband case are now in various states of disarray, as is the pressured plea deal of former mid-level Enron executive, Chris Calger. [read post]