Search for: "In re R.C."
Results 201 - 220
of 300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
In In re Minnesota Breast Implant Litigation, 36 F. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
(citing In re Appropriation for Hwy. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 6:12 am
At issue in the case is whether R.C. 2305.23, Ohio’s Good Samaritan statute, provides immunity to a lay person attempting to provide emergency assistance to an injured party at the scene of an accident. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:42 am
And we’re not getting to the truth. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 3:58 pm
This dissent was also a re-hash, with one exception. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
IN RE C.H. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:11 am
”) R.C. 2929.13 (F)(6) (A first- or second-degree felony sentence must be mandatory if the defendant had a prior conviction for another first- or second degree felony, or any other equivalent offense) Apprendi v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:47 am
Concluding Observation R.C. 2929.12(F) has been amended, effective March 11, 2013. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:42 am
If you’re going to file an Anders brief which could have resulted in your client spending six years in prison he didn’t have to, you probably shouldn’t be doing appellate work. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:04 am
Historic cases outside Ohio In re Baby M. 537 A.2d 1227, 109 N.J. 396 (1988) • N.J. [read post]
20 May 2021, 11:27 am
Allegedly, R.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:25 am
The Fifth District Court of Appeals reversed as to both, finding that a violation of departmental policy or traffic laws may be a factor in determining whether a political subdivision employee is entitled to immunity under R.C. 2744. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:46 am
In re: R.K. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 12:00 am
Of course, if you’re happily married, you hope and pray that you’ll never be in the place of having to cash one in. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 1:03 pm
Dep’t of Natural Res., 62 Ohio St. 2d 138 (1980)( The purpose of the immunity is “to encourage owners of premises suitable for recreational pursuits to open their land to public use without worrying about liability. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:45 am
”) R.C. 2505.02(B)(2) (A final order is one that affects a substantial right made in a special proceeding or upon a summary application in an action after judgment.) [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:12 am
The BWC asks the Court to re-affirm the established framework for resolving this type of workers’ compensation claim, which focuses on objective facts regarding the employment relationship and the employee’s actions. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:31 pm
While fees to sponsors are capped, R.C. 3314.03(C), there is no ceiling on the amount of funding that can be passed on to private operators such as White Hat. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
The state believes that under the final appealable order statute, R.C. 2505.02, there is an adequate remedy for the defendant following a judgment of conviction if that happens. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:08 pm
(explaining that res judicata applies to actions for postconviction relief); State v. [read post]
