Search for: "In re That Portion of Lots 1 & 2" Results 201 - 220 of 1,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
It’ll still only be an extra $1 of taxes since there’s no way that $1.16 is growing to $2. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:00 am by Andrew Appel
At least in New Hampshire it’s easy to ask for a recount and the Secretary of State’s office has lots of experience doing recounts. [read post]
27 May 2015, 9:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It’s an interesting contrast between (1) and (2)—several pages of requirements for blanket protection w/out having to consider fair use. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Jason Rantanen
Figure 1: Citations to Federal Circuit and Fifth Circuit Opinions in Federal Circuit Mandamus Decisions Reviewing § 1404(a) Transfer Denials by Judge Albright This result holds across both (1) the precedential status of the citing decision and (2) whether the citing decision granted or denied mandamus. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 5:41 am
  That leaves a lot of people who're still hungry without much left on the bank's carcass. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:58 am by Dan Harris
” Our lead China employment lawyer, Grace Yang, is Chinese and she graduated from Beijing University Law School and I have zero doubt that she 1) knows China employment law ten times better than the Chinese companies trying to cheat their expat employees and that she 2) is going to be a helluva lot more objective on this issue than the Chinese companies that profit from it. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 8:28 am by Steven Koprince
  If you’re a visual learner, FAR 1.105-2 has you covered, too, with this handy-dandy graphic: FAR 1.105-2 has more information on the organization of the FAR. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:13 pm by Norman Gregory Fernandez
The 2018 Sturgis Motorcycle Rally for me stood out most on two counts, (1) It is back, there were much more people, and (2) the riding was excellent. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 7:22 am by Andrew Delaney
The trial court granted summary judgment for the City and BTC Mall Associates on two grounds: (1) the study is not a “public record” under the PRA; and (2) even if it were a public record, the redacted information is exempt as a “trade secret. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 12:21 pm by Jason Rantanen
1) Give district courts discretion to punish frivolous suit 2) Forcing patent holders to be more clear in their claims in Biosig v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
It’s just better to start by saying that you’re going to save $X a month rather than leaving it to chance. 2. [read post]