Search for: "In the Interest of E.G., Minor Child"
Results 201 - 220
of 496
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2024, 9:35 am
The court later stated that it had concerns about either party owning a firearm and asserted that it could "make findings pursuant to Family Code Section 3011 for the best interest of the minor children. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
See, e.g., NYT Am. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 10:04 am
This includes bank accounts, IRAs, 401(k)s, business interests, life insurance, annuities, and even real property. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
This includes bank accounts, IRAs, 401(k)s, business interests, life insurance, annuities, and even real property. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 6:20 am
The law, which became fully effective in September 2021, starts with the principle that any service be designed with the “best interest of the child” as a primary consideration. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 11:55 am
Highly advanced attack modalities are the most scientifically interesting, but they are not generally the most criminally or politically interesting, simply because much less sophisticated and cheaper attacks will get the job done. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Section 2G2.2, which you can find here, sets out the circumstances that are specific to offenses involving the sexual exploitation of minors, which includes child pornography crimes. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 6:45 pm
Yet, at least for Samuel, since he is over 18, he cannot be subjected to a custody order (see e.g. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:35 pm
In 2006, Congress enacted 18 U.S.C. 4248 as part of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
Creates doctrinal incoherence: if everything is a design, then it is difficult to apply the other rules about, e.g., prior art and how to deal with parent/child applications. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 3:00 am
In addition, non-contact acts of indecent exposure, possess child pornography, abduction or detention, solicitation, and loitering near school, where victims involved were under the age of 18, are designated serious. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:35 am
The court should have thus considered A's protected interests under Article 8 ECHR in posting a picture of her grandson before ordering her to take it offline. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 3:02 am
One might say that a reasonable paying client who has been the victim of dv serious enough to qualify for legal aid in the first place, or who has concerns sufficiently serious to be able to pass the child protection test in reg 34 might be entirely reasonable in wishing to pursue minor “details” regarding contact, such as supervision or overnight stays. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
In addition to being itself interesting, it also helped round out the semester a bit. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 5:38 am
Same thing would seem to apply in any other state (e.g. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 2:30 pm
” However, the producer, Ryan Kohls, assured me that they were, in fact, interested in pushing back on Greenwald’s “black and white” account of the program and bringing nuance to the debate. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:35 pm
See e.g. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 3:15 am
Furthermore, it is not uncommon at this stage for the divorcing parties to give minority ownership to the child. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:06 am
And the Department of Justice itself has disavowed responsible procreation and optimal child rearing as sufficient rationales for DOMA, citing to empirical studies about child development and reports by leading medical, psychological, and social welfare organizations. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
This might be race indifference (e.g., “the epistemic contract of responsible-drug-use erasure” that permits white and/or white collar professionals to smoke and snort while their minority/poor counterparts are punished); beliefs that drug use had nothing to do with religion or privacy; and/or genuine fear about heroin in the 70s and crack in the 80s that spilled over into marijuana (particularly in minority communities). [read post]