Search for: "In the Matter of: Jonathan S. C-B" Results 201 - 220 of 298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
If you want to find the posts that have a particular tag, copy and paste the word(s) into the search box at the top left of this page, and when you find a post that has that tag, click on that tag. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:08 am by Peter Mahler
  In 2005, general partner Jonathan Poole — the plaintiff in the case at hand — resigned as general partner as part of a lawsuit settlement. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:02 am by admin
January 24, 2013 Steve Szentesi Kevin Wright (Davis LLP) (with contributions by Jonathan Gilhen – Davis LLP) Extract from a chapter to be published in CLEBC’s Annual Review of Law & Practice – 2013 ____________________ 2012 was a busy year for Canadian competition and foreign investment law, with significant developments in all major areas including misleading advertising, mergers, abuse of dominance, criminal matters (including cartels, bid-rigging… [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:21 pm by Samuel Bagenstos
§ 36B(b)(2)(A), (c)(2)(A)(i), that phrase does not have the exclusionary meaning Cannon attributes to it. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:43 pm
 § 36B(b)(2)(A), (c)(2)(A)(i), that phrase does not have the exclusionary meaning Cannon attributes to it. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am by Howard Knopf
The relevant factors to be considered include:a. the quality and quantity of the material taken;b. the extent to which the respondent’s use adversely affects the applicant’s activities and diminishes the value of the applicant’s copyright;c. whether the material taken is the proper subject-matter of a copyright;d. whether the respondent intentionally appropriated the applicant’s work to save time and effort; ande.… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:48 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Proponent for proposed Classes 7B and C. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Commenters didn’t seem to object to renewal of the exemption but claim there’s some kind of misuse, b/c lower quality alternatives are available. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
    Jonathan Joseph is a member of the California State Bar and has focused for over 33 years on regulatory, corporate, securities and transactional matters for banks and bank holding companies and officers and directors of distressed and failed institutions. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:54 am by Matthew Bush
§ 1132(a), accrues when a plan publishes and describes an unlawful change in benefits in its plan materials or only years later when the participant recognizes the legal error; (2) whether, when a plan’s methodology for calculating benefits is deemed void years later and it becomes necessary to determine which of a number of ERISA-compliant formulas the plan would have selected, a court should defer to the view of a plan administrator with “the exclusive right to interpret… [read post]